How we tested this pattern
- Sample
- 63,340 occurrences on 6 markets (crypto, forex, US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities), 1970 to 2026.
- Detection
- Found by code, never picked by hand: every match of the rule on full price history, winners and losers alike.bullish hikkake pattern: After a downtrend: an inside bar; the next bar breaks below it (lower high and lower low); within 3 bars, a close above the inside-bar high confirms the trap. Dated at the confirming close.bearish hikkake pattern: After an uptrend: an inside bar; the next bar breaks above it (higher high and higher low); within 3 bars, a close below the inside-bar low confirms the trap. Dated at the confirming close.
- Benchmark
- Each occurrence is compared with the same assets on random bars: the move 10 bars later, and a 2:1 reward-to-risk trade.
- Checks
- Block bootstrap and a correction for the thousands of tests we run, plus a random-walk self-test that the bench passes: on random prices, no pattern should win.
- Updated
- Data updated November 5, 2026, code version c2a1683f. Read the methodology · bullish hikkake pattern data (JSON) · bearish hikkake pattern data (JSON)
At a glance: what textbooks say, what we measured
- Pattern
- Bullish hikkake
- Occurrences tested
- 27,413 occurrences, all markets, daily
- Textbook: price should rise after it
- Too close to call · −0.18% vs the market, 10 bars
- Its best market and timeframe, still negative, US stocks left out
- Forex, 1-hour: −0.01 R 2:1 trade vs random dates, not proven
- Verdict
- 10-bar move: Weak, below chance2:1 trade: No clear edge
- Pattern
- Bearish hikkake
- Occurrences tested
- 35,927 occurrences, all markets, daily
- Textbook: price should fall after it
- Too close to call · +0.005% vs the market, 10 bars
- Its best market and timeframe, still negative
- Crypto, 1-hour: −0.02 R 2:1 trade vs random dates, not proven
- Verdict
- 10-bar move: No clear edge2:1 trade: No clear edge
On this page
- What is the hikkake pattern?
- The psychology behind the hikkake pattern
- How to identify the hikkake pattern on your charts
- Bullish vs. bearish hikkake patterns
- Step-by-step trading strategy for the hikkake pattern
- The modified hikkake pattern explained
- Does the hikkake pattern work?
- Combining with technical indicators
- Real-world examples of the hikkake pattern
- Pros and cons of using the hikkake strategy
- Common mistakes to avoid when trading hikkake
- Hikkake indicator and detection code
- Frequently asked questions about the hikkake pattern
- Summary
The hikkake pattern is a false breakout of an inside bar. Price contracts into an inside bar, breaks out of it in one direction, then turns around and closes back through the other side within three bars. Traders who bought or sold the first breakout are trapped, and the pattern bets on the move that follows when they exit.
This guide explains how to identify the bullish and bearish hikkake, how traders set entry, stop and target, and what actually happened next. Our test bench scanned full market history with a strict definition and detected 27,413 bullish and 35,927 bearish ones on daily charts alone across stocks, crypto, forex, ETFs, indices and commodities, and compared the outcome with random bars on the same assets.
What is the hikkake pattern?
The hikkake pattern is a price pattern built on a failed breakout. It was named and described by Daniel L. Chesler. Hikkake is a Japanese verb that translates as to trick, to trap or to ensnare: the first breakout is the trick, and the traders who follow it are the ones caught.
It is not a classic Japanese candlestick pattern, and it works the same on bar charts and candlestick charts. The color of the candles does not matter. Only the highs, the lows and the closes count.
Our bench applies the rules below without judgment, with two choices worth knowing: the bullish hikkake must follow a downtrend and the bearish one an uptrend, and the confirmation needs a close, not a simple touch, the stricter version.
The psychology behind the hikkake pattern
An inside bar shows a pause: the range contracts and volatility falls. The inside-bar breakout method treats that break as a signal and places orders just beyond the bar, with a stop on the other side. When price breaks down, the breakout traders sell. When price then turns around and closes above the inside bar, those short traders are wrong, and their buy stops add fuel to the move up.
That is the idea behind the hikkake: trade against the crowd that followed the first breakout. It is a plausible story about order flow. Whether it gives an edge is a question for data, and we answer it below.
How to identify the hikkake pattern on your charts
The hikkake pattern has four parts, always in the same order: the mother bar, the inside bar, the false breakout and the confirming close.
- Mother barcontains the next bar
- Inside barhigh and low inside the mother bar
- False breaklower high and lower low than the inside bar
- Confirming closeabove the inside-bar high, within 3 bars
- Mother barcontains the next bar
- Inside barhigh and low inside the mother bar
- False breakhigher high and higher low than the inside bar
- Confirming closebelow the inside-bar low, within 3 bars
The inside bar formation
The first step is an inside bar: its high is below the high of the bar before it, and its low is above that bar's low. The bar before it is called the mother bar. On daily charts, an inside bar is also called an inside day. A harami is a similar idea applied to candle bodies only; the hikkake uses the full range, wicks included.
The false breakout candle
The next bar breaks out of the inside bar on one side only. For a bullish hikkake, it has a lower high and a lower low: a breakdown. For a bearish hikkake, it has a higher high and a higher low: a breakout to the upside. This is the move that traps traders.
The trigger and reversal move
Within the next three bars, price must close back through the opposite side of the inside bar: above its high for a bullish hikkake, below its low for a bearish one. If that does not happen within three bars, there is no hikkake, and the first breakout may simply be a real breakout. Our bench dates the pattern at that confirming close.
Bullish vs. bearish hikkake patterns
Both versions have the same structure; only the direction of the false move changes.
Identifying a bullish hikkake
It forms after a decline. The false move is down, the expected move is up.
Identifying a bearish hikkake
It forms after a rally. The false move is up, the expected move is down.
The charts above are schematic drawings of the rule, not measured data: they show the sequence of bars the rule asks for, and where the trade we test puts its entry, stop and target.
Step-by-step trading strategy for the hikkake pattern
There are two ways to trade a hikkake. The classic one places an order at the opposite side of the inside bar as soon as the false breakout appears, and cancels it if it is not filled within three bars. The version our bench tests waits for the confirming close, then enters on a break of the pattern's own bars.
- Entry
- Buy stop at the pattern high
- Stop loss (SL)
- At the pattern low
- Target (TP)
- Twice the risk (2:1)
- Entry
- Sell stop at the pattern low
- Stop loss (SL)
- At the pattern high
- Target (TP)
- Twice the risk (2:1)
A clean case from our bench: US stocksChosen on its shape alone, never on the outcome. A result above +2 R or below −1 R means a bar opened past the target or the stop, and the trade was closed at that open. Stock prices are adjusted for splits and dividends, so they can differ from the prices quoted at the time.
A clean case from our bench: US stocksChosen on its shape alone, never on the outcome. Stock prices are adjusted for splits and dividends, so they can differ from the prices quoted at the time.
Setting up your entry point
For a bullish hikkake, we place a buy order just above the highest high of the pattern (its four to six bars, from the bar before the inside bar to the confirming close), after the confirming close. For a bearish one, a sell order just below the lowest low. On daily charts, the buy order was filled in 83.5% of bullish cases; in 15.5% of cases, price broke the low of the pattern first and the trade was canceled. The remaining setups touched neither level within the 20 bars our test allows.
Managing risk with stop loss placement
Determining profit targets
The target we test is twice the risk (a 2:1 reward-to-risk ratio). Because the stop is wide, targets take time: on daily charts, bullish hikkake trades that reached the 2:1 target took a median of 18 bars, and trades that were stopped took a median of 9 bars. Another approach is the next support or resistance level, or a trailing stop once the trade is in profit. We have only tested the fixed 2:1 target.
The modified hikkake pattern explained
The modified hikkake adds conditions before the false breakout: a context bar, an inside bar that closes near its high (for the bearish version) or near its low (for the bullish one), then a second inside bar. It is much rarer. On daily charts our bench found 223 bullish modified hikkake patterns, against 27,413 standard ones. The extra conditions did not help: the bullish modified hikkake reached the 2:1 target 33.7% of the time, against 33.4% for the same trade on random dates, a gap too small to count.
Does the hikkake pattern work?
Not on its own. On daily charts, the hikkake was followed by a move in its direction about as often as a random bar on the same assets, or slightly less often for the bullish version (51.6% against 53.0%), a gap in average excess return that passes a simple test but not our correction for multiple testing. On hourly charts, each version slightly moved against the expected direction relative to its market, a small gap that does survive our correction (rated Worse than chance for both versions). Here are the numbers from our test bench, which applies the same strict rule on full market history.
Moved the expected way 10 bars later, compared with random bars.
Measured on 27,413 daily bullish hikkake occurrences across 2,270 assets. Random bars on the same assets are the honest baseline.
Weak, below chanceMoved the expected way 10 bars later, compared with random bars.
Measured on 35,927 daily bearish hikkake occurrences across 2,241 assets. Random bars on the same assets are the honest baseline.
No clear edgeBullish hikkake against random bars on the same assets, by market, on daily candles. Bars of almost the same length mean no edge.
- All markets
- Crypto
- US stocks
- Forex
- ETFs
- Indices
- Commodities
- All markets
- Crypto
- US stocks
- Forex
- ETFs
- Indices
- Commodities
Bearish hikkake against random bars on the same assets, by market, on daily candles. Bars of almost the same length mean no edge.
- All markets
- Crypto
- US stocks
- Forex
- ETFs
- Indices
- Commodities
- All markets
- Crypto
- US stocks
- Forex
- ETFs
- Indices
- Commodities
All statistics
Full results for the hikkake pattern, market by market
Every occurrence our rule finds on full price history, compared with what the same assets did on random bars. A pattern only earns an edge if it beats random entries after correcting for the thousands of tests we run.
Our verdict
Weak, below chance. It does slightly worse than the baseline, but not in every check.
Bullish hikkake: 27,413 occurrences tested
Bullish pattern · All markets · Daily · 2,270 assets · 1970-04 to 2026-10
What this means. A difference shows up (p < 0.05), but below the baseline, and it does not survive the multiple-testing correction. For the 2:1 trade: no measurable difference from the same trade on random dates on the same assets.
Timeline
- Entry triggered, after the pattern
- 1 day · middle half 1 to 1 · on 22,894 triggered entries
- Stop order beyond the pattern's extreme. 129 of these entries are not among the 22,765 trades: still open at the end of our data, or left out by the trade rules.
- Time to the 2:1 target, when hit
- 18 days · middle half 10 to 34 · on 8,457 trades that hit it
- Time to the stop, when hit
- 9 days · middle half 4 to 20 · on 13,401 trades that hit it
- Time in the trade, all exits
- 13 days · middle half 6 to 28 · on 22,765 trades
Size and trade path
- Pattern range, high to low
- 6.0% · middle half 4.0% to 9.5% · on 27,413 occurrences
- Range vs average bar (ATR)
- 1.85× · middle half 1.51× to 2.25× · on 27,413 occurrences
- Best open profit during the trade
- 1.16 R · middle half 0.35 R to 2.08 R · on 22,765 trades
- Stopped trades that were first up 1 R
- 22.2% · on 13,401 stopped trades
- Trades a stop moved to breakeven at +1 R would have closed flat instead of at a loss
- Entry order triggered
- 83.5% · on 27,413 occurrences
Medians, each on the cases named on its line; "middle half" spans the 25th to 75th percentile; no value under 30 cases.
How we detect it. After a downtrend: an inside bar; the next bar breaks below it (lower high and lower low); within 3 bars, a close above the inside-bar high confirms the trap. Dated at the confirming close. Candlestick counts are not checked against planted examples, so they may not be exhaustive.
All measurements (20 rows)
10-bar move: did price go the expected way?
| Market | Occurrences | Pattern | Random bars | Excess | 10-bar move verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto · 1-hour | 53,118 | 46.0% | 48.3% | −0.12% | Opposite of the textbook |
| Forex · 1-hour | 7,120 | 48.4% | 50.6% | −0.01% | Weak, below chance |
| All markets · 1-hour | 60,238 | 46.2% | 48.5% | −0.11% | Opposite of the textbook |
| Crypto · 4-hour | 13,987 | 45.3% | 47.3% | −0.37% | Opposite of the textbook |
| Forex · 4-hour | 1,885 | 48.5% | 50.5% | −0.03% | No clear edge |
| All markets · 4-hour | 15,872 | 45.7% | 47.7% | −0.33% | Opposite of the textbook |
| Crypto · Daily | 2,848 | 38.2% | 44.1% | −0.75% | Weak, below chance |
| US stocks · Daily | 22,960 | 53.1% | 54.0% | −0.11% | No clear edge |
| ETFs · Daily | 644 | 55.5% | 56.1% | −0.10% | No clear edge |
| Indices · Daily | 422 | 57.5% | 57.0% | −0.27% | No clear edge |
| Forex · Daily | 300 | 46.5% | 50.1% | −0.14% | No clear edge |
| Commodities · Daily | 239 | 50.6% | 51.8% | +0.42% | No clear edge |
| All markets · Daily | 27,413 | 51.6% | 53.0% | −0.18% | Weak, below chance |
| Crypto · Weekly | 315 | 36.8% | 37.1% | −6.89% | Not enough data |
| US stocks · Weekly | 4,152 | 54.8% | 56.7% | −0.55% | No clear edge |
| ETFs · Weekly | 85 | 58.8% | 60.6% | +0.59% | No clear edge |
| Indices · Weekly | 48 | 50.0% | 61.8% | −0.69% | No clear edge |
| Forex · Weekly | 54 | 46.3% | 51.7% | −0.46% | No clear edge |
| Commodities · Weekly | 39 | 56.8% | 53.3% | −0.48% | No clear edge |
| All markets · Weekly | 4,693 | 53.6% | 55.5% | −0.94% | Weak, below chance |
2:1 trade: target hit and average result
| Market | Trades | Target hit | Same trade, random dates | Per trade | 2:1 trade verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto · 1-hour | 43,905 | 30.4% | 31.7% | −0.02 R vs +0.01 R | No clear edge |
| Forex · 1-hour | 5,922 | 31.1% | 31.4% | −0.02 R vs −0.01 R | No clear edge |
| All markets · 1-hour | 49,827 | 30.5% | 31.6% | −0.02 R vs +0.01 R | No clear edge |
| Crypto · 4-hour | 11,185 | 32.9% | 32.3% | +0.05 R vs +0.02 R | No clear edge |
| Forex · 4-hour | 1,594 | 29.9% | 31.9% | −0.06 R vs 0.00 R | No clear edge |
| All markets · 4-hour | 12,779 | 32.5% | 32.2% | +0.04 R vs +0.02 R | No clear edge |
| Crypto · Daily | 2,164 | 33.1% | 34.8% | +0.03 R vs +0.07 R | No clear edge |
| US stocks · Daily | 19,284 | 37.6% | 36.9% | +0.18 R vs +0.16 R | No clear edge |
| ETFs · Daily | 521 | 39.7% | 37.5% | +0.23 R vs +0.18 R | No clear edge |
| Indices · Daily | 364 | 37.1% | 38.7% | +0.20 R vs +0.22 R | No clear edge |
| Forex · Daily | 246 | 27.6% | 29.1% | −0.08 R vs −0.09 R | No clear edge |
| Commodities · Daily | 186 | 40.9% | 39.2% | +0.32 R vs +0.20 R | No clear edge |
| All markets · Daily | 22,765 | 37.1% | 36.7% | +0.17 R vs +0.15 R | No clear edge |
| Crypto · Weekly | 209 | 38.8% | 35.7% | +0.16 R vs +0.07 R | Not enough data |
| US stocks · Weekly | 3,571 | 44.7% | 41.8% | +0.39 R vs +0.31 R | No clear edge |
| ETFs · Weekly | 79 | 50.6% | 35.7% | +0.58 R vs +0.17 R | No clear edge |
| Indices · Weekly | 45 | 44.4% | 45.6% | +0.37 R vs +0.48 R | No clear edge |
| Forex · Weekly | 47 | 23.4% | 37.9% | −0.24 R vs +0.21 R | No clear edge |
| Commodities · Weekly | 33 | 54.5% | 36.6% | +0.70 R vs +0.15 R | No clear edge |
| All markets · Weekly | 3,984 | 44.3% | 41.3% | +0.37 R vs +0.30 R | No clear edge |
Our verdict
Not a reliable signal on its own here. Use it as context, not as a trigger.
Bearish hikkake: 35,927 occurrences tested
Bearish pattern · All markets · Daily · 2,241 assets · 1970-08 to 2026-10
What this means. No measurable difference from the rest of its market over the next 10 bars.
Timeline
- Entry triggered, after the pattern
- 1 day · middle half 1 to 2 · on 29,012 triggered entries
- Stop order beyond the pattern's extreme. 331 of these entries are not among the 28,681 trades: still open at the end of our data, or left out by the trade rules.
- Time to the 2:1 target, when hit
- 15 days · middle half 8 to 29 · on 7,491 trades that hit it
- Time to the stop, when hit
- 9 days · middle half 4 to 20 · on 20,269 trades that hit it
- Time in the trade, all exits
- 11 days · middle half 5 to 24 · on 28,681 trades
Size and trade path
- Pattern range, high to low
- 4.9% · middle half 3.3% to 7.6% · on 35,927 occurrences
- Range vs average bar (ATR)
- 1.90× · middle half 1.56× to 2.32× · on 35,927 occurrences
- Best open profit during the trade
- 0.80 R · middle half 0.28 R to 2.01 R · on 28,681 trades
- Stopped trades that were first up 1 R
- 21.7% · on 20,269 stopped trades
- Trades a stop moved to breakeven at +1 R would have closed flat instead of at a loss
- Entry order triggered
- 80.8% · on 35,927 occurrences
Medians, each on the cases named on its line; "middle half" spans the 25th to 75th percentile; no value under 30 cases.
How we detect it. After an uptrend: an inside bar; the next bar breaks above it (higher high and higher low); within 3 bars, a close below the inside-bar low confirms the trap. Dated at the confirming close. Candlestick counts are not checked against planted examples, so they may not be exhaustive.
All measurements (20 rows)
10-bar move: did price go the expected way?
| Market | Occurrences | Pattern | Random bars | Excess | 10-bar move verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto · 1-hour | 46,379 | 48.9% | 50.6% | −0.08% | Weak, below chance |
| Forex · 1-hour | 7,431 | 47.4% | 49.2% | −0.01% | No clear edge |
| All markets · 1-hour | 53,810 | 48.7% | 50.4% | −0.07% | Opposite of the textbook |
| Crypto · 4-hour | 14,400 | 49.2% | 51.9% | +0.02% | No clear edge |
| Forex · 4-hour | 2,087 | 47.6% | 49.2% | −0.02% | No clear edge |
| All markets · 4-hour | 16,487 | 49.0% | 51.6% | +0.01% | No clear edge |
| Crypto · Daily | 1,863 | 52.4% | 54.9% | −0.34% | No clear edge |
| US stocks · Daily | 31,672 | 45.6% | 45.4% | +0.03% | No clear edge |
| ETFs · Daily | 1,094 | 42.9% | 42.8% | +0.01% | No clear edge |
| Indices · Daily | 651 | 40.4% | 42.6% | −0.21% | No clear edge |
| Forex · Daily | 361 | 52.1% | 48.7% | +0.06% | No clear edge |
| Commodities · Daily | 286 | 47.4% | 47.2% | −0.01% | No clear edge |
| All markets · Daily | 35,927 | 45.9% | 45.9% | +0.005% | No clear edge |
| Crypto · Weekly | 227 | 66.5% | 60.4% | −1.58% | Not enough data |
| US stocks · Weekly | 7,099 | 40.5% | 42.0% | −0.38% | No clear edge |
| ETFs · Weekly | 267 | 31.7% | 37.3% | −0.58% | No clear edge |
| Indices · Weekly | 103 | 39.8% | 37.2% | +0.16% | No clear edge |
| Forex · Weekly | 64 | 43.5% | 49.3% | −0.24% | No clear edge |
| Commodities · Weekly | 44 | 47.7% | 43.4% | +0.43% | No clear edge |
| All markets · Weekly | 7,804 | 41.0% | 42.3% | −0.41% | Weak, below chance |
2:1 trade: target hit and average result
| Market | Trades | Target hit | Same trade, random dates | Per trade | 2:1 trade verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto · 1-hour | 38,135 | 27.1% | 28.6% | −0.05 R vs −0.02 R | No clear edge |
| Forex · 1-hour | 6,130 | 29.7% | 31.1% | −0.06 R vs −0.02 R | No clear edge |
| All markets · 1-hour | 44,265 | 27.5% | 29.0% | −0.05 R vs −0.02 R | No clear edge |
| Crypto · 4-hour | 11,803 | 27.3% | 27.4% | −0.02 R vs −0.03 R | No clear edge |
| Forex · 4-hour | 1,738 | 29.6% | 31.9% | −0.06 R vs 0.00 R | No clear edge |
| All markets · 4-hour | 13,541 | 27.6% | 28.0% | −0.03 R vs −0.03 R | No clear edge |
| Crypto · Daily | 1,361 | 24.3% | 24.0% | −0.05 R vs −0.04 R | No clear edge |
| US stocks · Daily | 25,431 | 26.1% | 26.6% | −0.18 R vs −0.17 R | No clear edge |
| ETFs · Daily | 837 | 26.6% | 28.0% | −0.20 R vs −0.15 R | No clear edge |
| Indices · Daily | 514 | 28.0% | 33.3% | −0.16 R vs 0.00 R | No clear edge |
| Forex · Daily | 315 | 28.9% | 29.5% | −0.12 R vs −0.08 R | No clear edge |
| Commodities · Daily | 223 | 25.6% | 26.7% | −0.19 R vs −0.16 R | No clear edge |
| All markets · Daily | 28,681 | 26.1% | 26.7% | −0.18 R vs −0.16 R | No clear edge |
| Crypto · Weekly | 43 | 14.0% | 18.4% | −0.47 R vs −0.34 R | Not enough data |
| US stocks · Weekly | 5,480 | 19.9% | 20.9% | −0.36 R vs −0.33 R | No clear edge |
| ETFs · Weekly | 225 | 17.3% | 21.9% | −0.45 R vs −0.32 R | No clear edge |
| Indices · Weekly | 87 | 24.1% | 28.1% | −0.27 R vs −0.14 R | No clear edge |
| Forex · Weekly | 54 | 35.2% | 32.9% | +0.09 R vs 0.00 R | No clear edge |
| Commodities · Weekly | 33 | 15.2% | 20.2% | −0.36 R vs −0.37 R | No clear edge |
| All markets · Weekly | 5,922 | 19.9% | 21.1% | −0.36 R vs −0.32 R | No clear edge |
Data updated November 5, 2026 · code version c2a1683f · Read the methodology. We measure every pattern on crypto and forex (1-hour, 4-hour, daily and weekly charts) and US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities (daily and weekly charts). A market or timeframe from that list missing from the tables above had no occurrence.
What you often read
“The bullish hikkake is a reliable buy signal.”
What our data shows
On 27,413 daily occurrences, it moved in the expected direction 51.6% of the time, against 53.0% for random bars: its average excess return over the rest of the market passes a simple test but does not survive our correction.
What you often read
“The bearish hikkake is a reliable sell signal.”
What our data shows
On 35,927 daily occurrences, it moved in the expected direction 45.9% of the time, against 45.9% for random bars: no clear edge, since the average excess return is not statistically significant.
Bullish hikkake
Table quoted in the text (verdicts and every market: see All measurements)
| Market and timeframe | Patterns tested (2:1 trades) | Higher 10 bars later | Random bars | 2:1 target hit | Same trade, random dates | Expectancy (R) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All markets, daily | 27,413 (22,765) | 51.6% | 53.0% | 37.1% | 36.7% | +0.17 (random +0.15) |
| US stocks, daily | 22,960 (19,284) | 53.1% | 54.0% | 37.6% | 36.9% | +0.18 (random +0.16) |
| Crypto, hourly | 53,118 (43,905) | 46.0% | 48.3% | 30.4% | 31.7% | −0.02 (random +0.01) |
| Crypto, 4-hour | 13,987 (11,185) | 45.3% | 47.3% | 32.9% | 32.3% | +0.05 (random +0.02) |
| Forex, hourly | 7,120 (5,922) | 48.4% | 50.6% | 31.1% | 31.4% | −0.02 (random −0.01) |
| All markets, weekly | 4,693 (3,984) | 53.6% | 55.5% | 44.3% | 41.3% | +0.37 (random +0.30) |
Bearish hikkake
Table quoted in the text (verdicts and every market: see All measurements)
| Market and timeframe | Patterns tested (2:1 trades) | Lower 10 bars later | Random bars | 2:1 target hit | Same trade, random dates | Expectancy (R) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All markets, daily | 35,927 (28,681) | 45.9% | 45.9% | 26.1% | 26.7% | −0.18 (random −0.16) |
| US stocks, daily | 31,672 (25,431) | 45.6% | 45.4% | 26.1% | 26.6% | −0.18 (random −0.17) |
| Crypto, hourly | 46,379 (38,135) | 48.9% | 50.6% | 27.1% | 28.6% | −0.05 (random −0.02) |
| Crypto, 4-hour | 14,400 (11,803) | 49.2% | 51.9% | 27.3% | 27.4% | −0.02 (random −0.03) |
| Forex, hourly | 7,431 (6,130) | 47.4% | 49.2% | 29.7% | 31.1% | −0.06 (random −0.02) |
| All markets, weekly | 7,804 (5,922) | 41.0% | 42.3% | 19.9% | 21.1% | −0.36 (random −0.32) |
How to read these tables
Read each table in pairs of columns. On daily charts, 51.6% of bullish hikkake patterns were followed by a gain 10 days later, against 53.0% for random bars on the same assets. The excess return over the rest of the market after 10 days is −0.18%, with a 95% confidence interval from −0.34% to −0.03%: the whole interval is below zero, a gap that passes a simple test but not our correction, rated weak, below chance. No sign of an edge in the expected direction.
The 2:1 trade looks better at first: on daily charts, the bullish trade reached its target 37.1% of the time, for +0.17 R per trade before costs. But the same entry, stop and target on random dates averaged +0.15 R. Most of the gain comes from markets drifting up, not from the pattern, and the gap does not pass our statistical test.
Hourly charts lean negative. On 53,118 bullish hikkake patterns on hourly crypto, 46.0% were higher 10 bars later, against 48.3% for random bars, with an average excess return of −0.12% over the rest of the market: a small gap, but one that survives our correction for the thousands of tests we run. The next bar rose only 45.1% of the time, against 48.0%. On 4-hour crypto, the bullish hikkake also lagged the rest of the market, rated worse than chance, while on hourly crypto the bearish one moved against the expected direction relative to its market without surviving our correction. The 2:1 trade showed no clear edge on these charts.
Combining with technical indicators
Since the hikkake alone has no clear edge, a filter can be added. We tested two of them; the others are habits worth testing on your own market.
Using relative strength index (RSI) for confirmation
One rule takes bullish hikkake patterns only when the RSI is near oversold, and bearish ones near overbought. We have not tested an RSI filter.
Combining with moving averages for trend alignment
A trend filter takes signals only in the direction of the larger trend, for example bullish ones above the 200-day average. We split daily bullish occurrences that way: above the average, the 2:1 trade reached its target 36.4% of the time (+0.14 R); below it, 37.7% (+0.19 R). The filter barely changed the result.
Volume analysis during the breakout phase
One volume rule says the false breakout should come on weak volume and the reversal on strong volume. We measured volume on the bar that completes the pattern only: above 1.5 times the 20-day average, the daily bullish trade reached its target 36.0% of the time, against 37.5% on normal volume. These breakdowns are descriptive and not corrected for the number of tests.
Real-world examples of the hikkake pattern
The gallery of this section shows real hikkake patterns, picked by our bench (best and worst results, textbook shapes, most recent cases and typical draws, where a market has them), with their actual outcome. The cases written up below come from daily crypto charts, not from that gallery.
Real occurrences from our test bench, each on its market's main timeframe. Crypto and US stock examples come from liquid assets only (the largest coins, the most traded stocks). Best and Worst are the best and worst 2:1 trade results, Textbook the cleanest shapes (chosen on geometry alone, never on the outcome), Most recent the latest detections among the assets the gallery draws from, Typical a random draw. Shaded area: the pattern. Dashed lines: entry, stop loss (SL) and 2:1 target (TP) of the tested trade. Dotted line: 10 bars after the signal. A result above +2 R or below −1 R means a bar opened past the target or the stop, and the trade was closed at that open. Stock prices are adjusted for splits and dividends, so they can differ from the prices quoted at the time. We left out 25 cards: 1 with a bar far out of line with the bars around it (a likely bad quote), 18 with a shape that does not read as the definition on this page, 2 with a single bar so large that the pattern or the trade levels could not be read, 4 with a candle that is the thin first bar of the trading week. They still count in the statistics, and are not replaced: our bench picks a fixed number of cards per category.
A bullish hikkake that worked
On June 27, 2026, SOL/USDT printed an inside bar (high 73.19, low 70.25) inside the bar of June 26. On June 28, price broke below it with a lower high and a lower low, at 69.74. On June 29, SOL closed at 75.16, above the high of the inside bar: a bullish hikkake. The buy order at 76.49 was filled on July 1, with a stop at 65.91, the low of the June 26 bar that contained the inside bar, and a 2:1 target at 97.65. SOL was 3.8% higher 10 days after the pattern, and price reached the target on August 22, 2026.
A slower winner
On June 21, 2022, NEAR/USDT closed at 3.518, above the inside bar high of 3.511, three bars after a false breakdown to 2.875. The buy order at 3.835 was filled on June 24, with a stop at 2.875. NEAR was 4.7% lower 10 days after the pattern and dipped to 3.038 on July 13, but the stop held, and the 5.755 target was reached on August 10, 2022, 47 days after entry.
Failed hikkake setups
On February 13, 2026, ADA/USDT confirmed a bullish hikkake with a close at 0.2728. The buy order at 0.2747 was filled the next day, and price rose as high as 0.3136 on February 25, short of the 0.3233 target, then fell back and hit the stop at 0.2504 on March 8: a full 1 R loss. On January 21, 2021, ATOM/USDT confirmed a bearish hikkake with a close at 7.177. The next day, price dipped to 6.603, filling the sell order at 7.035, then rallied; ATOM was 13.5% higher 10 days later, and the stop at 10.2 was hit on February 5.
Pros and cons of using the hikkake strategy
- Pro: a precise, rule-based definition that leaves little room for interpretation.
- Pro: a clear invalidation point beyond the extreme of the pattern, where our test places the stop.
- Con: on its own, no clear edge on daily charts, and an average excess return over the rest of the market slightly below zero on hourly charts, a gap that survives our correction.
- Con: a wide stop (close to two ATR on the median pattern) and slow trades.
- Con: it is rare compared with single candles, about one every 236 to 309 bars on daily charts and 280 to 313 on hourly charts, all markets together.
Common mistakes to avoid when trading hikkake
- Calling any failed breakout a hikkake. The pattern starts with an inside bar, and the reversal must come within three bars.
- Entering before the confirming close. A bar can trade through the inside bar and close back inside it.
- Placing the stop inside the pattern to make the risk look small. Our test places the stop beyond the extreme of the pattern's own bars; a stop just beyond the false breakout can be tighter, and is untested.
- Trading it on hourly and 4-hour charts without testing. That is where our data leans below chance (rated Worse than chance).
Hikkake indicator and detection code
TradingView has community scripts that mark hikkake patterns, and some platforms include it in their pattern scanners. The open-source TA-Lib library has a CDLHIKKAKE function; our stricter rule finds 20% of the bearish and 22% of the bullish occurrences it flags. Definitions differ, so check whether your tool requires a close or only a touch of the inside bar, and whether it requires a prior trend. If you write your own code, add two checks that not every script includes: a prior trend (the close just before the pattern at least one average true range below the close 10 bars before it and in the lower half of the last 40 closes for a bullish signal, the mirror image for a bearish one), and a signal dated at the confirming close, with no data used after it.
Frequently asked questions about the hikkake pattern
Is the hikkake pattern reliable in all timeframes?
No. Several rows of the statistics section are rated worse than chance: both versions on hourly charts with all markets together, and the bullish version on hourly and 4-hour crypto charts, and on 4-hour charts with all markets together. A few others, such as the bullish version on daily and weekly charts with all markets together and on hourly forex charts, and the bearish one on hourly crypto charts and on weekly charts with all markets together, did slightly worse than chance without surviving our correction. On no timeframe did the hikkake beat chance in a way that survives it.
How does the hikkake differ from a standard breakout?
A standard inside bar breakout trades in the direction of the first break. The hikkake waits for that break to fail and trades the other way.
Can the hikkake be used in forex and stock markets?
Yes, the rules are the same. On hourly forex, 5,922 trades on bullish hikkake patterns reached the 2:1 target 31.1% of the time against 31.4% on random dates, for −0.02 R per trade against −0.01 R, a gap our test does not separate from chance. On daily US stocks, 19,284 trades on bullish ones reached it 37.6% of the time against 36.9%, a higher hit rate without a significant gain in the average result per trade.
How often does the hikkake appear?
For each direction, about one every 236 to 309 bars on daily charts and 280 to 313 on hourly charts, all markets together: on a watchlist of 20 stocks, one or two a month in each direction. Our definition is strict, so tools with looser rules flag more of them.
Summary
- The hikkake is a false breakout of an inside bar, confirmed by a close through the other side within three bars.
- On 27,413 daily bullish hikkake patterns, 51.6% were higher 10 days later, against 53.0% for random bars.
- On bullish hikkake patterns, the daily 2:1 trade averaged +0.17 R before costs, against +0.15 R for the same trade on random dates, a gap too small to separate from chance; on bearish ones, it averaged −0.18 R against −0.16 R on random dates.
- On hourly crypto, the average excess return of both versions over the rest of the market was slightly below zero: the bullish gap survives our statistical correction, the bearish one does not.
- The stop is wide, close to two ATR on the median pattern, so position size matters.
If you trade the hikkake, treat it as one input, not as a system. Wait for the close, put the stop beyond the extreme of the pattern, as our test does, size the position on that distance, and keep the risk per trade small.
About the author and the data. Written by Amaury, founder of PatternsWizard, who is passionate about finance, quantitative trading and data analysis. He built the PatternsWizard test bench, which detects each setup with fixed, published rules on full market history: crypto, forex, US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities. Trades and win rates are compared with random bars on the same assets, excess returns with the rest of the market, with error margins and a correction for multiple testing, and the whole pipeline is checked on random-walk prices, where nothing can be predicted. Statistics on this page were generated on November 5, 2026. The full methodology explains every step. This page is educational and is not investment advice: trading involves a risk of loss, and past results do not predict future ones.
