CandlestickNeutral

High Wave Candle: Meaning, How to Trade It and What the Data Shows

A small body between two long shadows, read as indecision. Here is how to trade its first break, and why on most markets that trade did no better than random dates.

· Founder of PatternsWizard
Updated Statistics updated 13 min read
High wave pattern

How we tested this pattern

Sample
789,764 occurrences on 6 markets (crypto, forex, US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities), 1970 to 2026.
Detection
Found by code, never picked by hand: every match of the rule on full price history, winners and losers alike.Short body with both shadows at least three times the body.
Benchmark
Each occurrence is compared with the same assets on random bars: the move 10 bars later, and a 2:1 reward-to-risk trade.
Checks
Block bootstrap and a correction for the thousands of tests we run, plus a random-walk self-test that the bench passes: on random prices, no pattern should win.
Updated
Data updated November 5, 2026, code version c2a1683f. Read the methodology · Raw data (JSON)

Every pattern's results on one sheet

The only pattern cheat sheet with tested stats: 152 patterns, what the textbook says and what really happened on 6 markets. Free PDF, sent to your inbox.

One email with the PDF, then a note when a result changes. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.

At a glance: what textbooks say, what we measured
Direction
Neutral
Occurrences tested
789,764 occurrences, all markets, daily
Where it did best
Crypto, weekly: +0.14 R 2:1 trade vs random dates, not proven
Verdict
2:1 trade: No clear edge

See the statistics

On this page
  1. What is the high wave candlestick pattern?
  2. Characteristics of the high wave candlestick
  3. How to identify the high wave candle on a chart
  4. What does the high wave candlestick indicate?
  5. How to trade the high wave candlestick pattern
  6. Trading strategies using the high wave pattern
  7. Reliability: what the data shows
  8. Real examples of the high wave candlestick pattern
  9. Comparison with similar candles
  10. Advantages of the high wave candlestick pattern
  11. Limitations and risks of the high wave pattern
  12. Tools and scanners for high wave candles
  13. Frequently asked questions
  14. Summary of key points

A high wave candle is a single candlestick with a small real body and long upper and lower shadows, each more than twice the length of the body. The shadows are long compared with the body, not necessarily with recent sessions: the median daily occurrence spans 0.74 times the average true range (ATR). It signals indecision in the market: buyers and sellers both pushed price far during the trading period, and neither kept control by the close.

This guide covers the definition, how to identify a high wave candlestick on a chart, what it indicates, how traders use it, and what happened after it. Our test bench applied one rule to full price history in six financial markets and found 789,764 on daily charts alone across stocks, crypto, forex, ETFs, indices and commodities, and compared the outcome with random days on the same assets.

What is the high wave candlestick pattern?

The high wave candlestick pattern is a one-candle indecision pattern. It has no direction of its own: it forms in an uptrend, in a downtrend or in a sideways market, in all financial markets, and its body can be green or red. It is not a reversal pattern by definition, but classical analysis reads it as a possible warning of a reversal of the current trend.

Understanding the high wave candlestick pattern

Steve Nison, who introduced Japanese candlestick charting to Western traders in Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991), presents high-wave candles next to spinning tops: a small real body with very long shadows, a sign that the market has lost its sense of direction. The name describes the shape: long waves of price in both directions.

Our test bench uses a rule written so a computer can apply it without judgment: a short real body, and both shadows more than twice as long as the body. Sizes are relative to the ten prior candles, as in the open-source TA-Lib library. No trend is required before the candle.

Characteristics of the high wave candlestick

The chart below is not drawn by hand. It is the median shape of the candles our bench detected, with the lines of the setup we test in each direction: entry at the break of one extreme of the candle, stop loss at the other extreme, target at twice the risk.

123
  1. Upper wick> 2 × body
  2. Short real body
  3. Lower wick> 2 × body
Median shape of 1,370 daily occurrences drawn at random from all markets, those with the candle colors drawn here (46% of the 3,000 drawn), found by our test bench.
TPSLEntryBearish
Bearish setup on the median shape of 1,370 daily occurrences drawn at random from all markets, with entry, stop loss (SL) and 2:1 target (TP)
TPSLEntryBullish
Bullish setup on the median shape of 1,370 daily occurrences drawn at random from all markets, with entry, stop loss (SL) and 2:1 target (TP)

Small real body

The real body, the distance between the open and close, is short compared with the previous candles. Its color does not matter: green means the close is slightly above the open, red slightly below.

Long upper and lower shadows

The upper and lower shadows (or wicks) are both more than twice the body. Each wick shows how far price traveled before it was pushed back. This is what separates it from a spinning top, where the shadows only need to be longer than the body. On the median daily occurrence our bench found, the total range of the candle covers 2.01% of price, or 0.74 times the average true range (ATR) of the asset. In other words, the typical one is not a large candle: its range is smaller than the average range of recent sessions. The name suggests a violent session, but the data shows a modest candle with a tiny body.

How to identify the high wave candle on a chart

To identify the pattern, check three points on a closed candle:

  1. The body is small compared with the previous candles.
  2. The upper shadow is more than twice the body.
  3. The lower shadow is too.

Then look at the context: where the candle forms relative to the current trend, to the previous swing highs and lows, and to support and resistance levels. In the classical reading, the same shape near a key price level after an extended move carries more weight than one in the middle of a range; we have not measured this.

It is a very common candle. On our data, it shows up about once every 11 bars on daily and hourly charts, and once every 10 bars on 4-hour charts.

What does the high wave candlestick indicate?

Market indecision and volatility

The candle tells the story of one trading period. Buyers push price well above the open, sellers push it well below, and the close ends near the open. Neither side won. Classical analysis reads it as indecision in the market: the prior move has lost its force, at least for one period.

Potential trend reversals

After a strong move, the classical reading treats this candle as an early warning of a reversal: in an uptrend, buyers could not hold the highs; in a downtrend, sellers could not hold the lows. The candle does not indicate which way price will go next, only that the market is undecided near that level. A reversal needs a break and a follow-through; the candle alone is not enough. We measured whether the prior trend matters: on daily charts, the candles that followed an uptrend reached a 2:1 target in 33.1% of cases, and after a downtrend in 34.1% of cases. Both are close to the 33.4% of the same setup on random dates across all daily candles.

How to trade the high wave candlestick pattern

Because the candle has no direction, the classic way to trade the high wave candlestick is to wait for price to break one of its extremes and follow that break. This is the setup our bench simulates on every occurrence, in every market.

Setting entry and exit levels

  • Place buy or long orders: a buy stop order just above the high of the candle.
  • Place sell or short orders: a sell stop order just below the low of the candle.
  • The first of the two orders filled is the position; cancel the other one.
  • Consider placing the orders only after the candle has closed.
  • Target: twice the risk, or the next support and resistance level.
TP buyBuy stopSell stopTP sellIndecision
Buy stop
At the pattern high, stop loss at the low
Sell stop
At the pattern low, stop loss at the high
Target (TP)
Twice the risk (2:1), on the side hit first
Whichever order is hit first is traded, the other is canceled. The trade our bench tests, drawn on the typical shape. Median shape of 1,370 daily occurrences drawn at random from all markets, those with the candle colors drawn here (46% of the 3,000 drawn).

A clean case from our bench: US stocksChosen on its shape alone, never on the outcome. A result above +2 R or below −1 R means a bar opened past the target or the stop, and the trade was closed at that open. Stock prices are adjusted for splits and dividends, so they can differ from the prices quoted at the time.

◂ Pattern32.5828.36+10 barsTPSLEntry2016-12
TextbookVZ January 10, 2017Daily chartPrice fell 5.7% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −2.54 R

In our tests, one side was triggered almost every time. On daily charts, trades that reached the 2:1 target took a median of 3 bars; trades that were stopped took a median of 2 bars.

Using stop-loss orders for risk management

Trading strategies using the high wave pattern

Combining with support and resistance levels

A candle of this type that forms near a resistance level after a rally, or near support after a decline, is where the classical reading looks for a reversal. The setups it prefers combine the candle with a level that already stopped price before, and take only the break in the direction of the reversal: a sell on the downside break at a resistance level, a buy on the upside break at a support level. We have not tested a support and resistance filter, so we cannot say whether it improves the result.

Using volume as a confirmation tool

The classical reading gives more weight to one printed on heavy volume, as a sign of a real fight between buyers and sellers. We measured it. On daily charts, candles with volume above 1.5 times the 20-day average reached the 2:1 target in 33.7% of cases, against 33.5% on normal volume. Volume did not change the result: as an indicator, it added nothing to this candlestick pattern.

Using the relative strength index (RSI)

Another filter combines the candle with the relative strength index: take the bearish break only when the RSI is above 70, and the bullish break only when it is below 30. We have not tested an RSI filter; if you use this indicator, test it on your own market first.

Trend filter with a moving average

On daily charts, occurrences above the 200-day moving average reached the 2:1 target in 33.2% of cases, against 34.1% below it. The 200-day filter changed little.

Reliability: what the data shows

We tested the break-out setup described above on every occurrence in our data and compared it with the same entry, stop and target placed on random dates of the same assets.

33.6%vs 33.4% at random

Hit the 2:1 target, compared with the same trade on random dates.

Measured on 788,323 closed trades on 789,764 daily high wave occurrences across 2,358 assets. The same trade on random dates on the same assets is the honest baseline.

No clear edge

High wave against random bars on the same assets, by market, on daily candles. Bars of almost the same length mean no edge.

2:1 trade hit its targetHigh wave tradeSame trade, random dates
  • All markets
    All markets, High wave trade: 33.6%
    All markets, Same trade, random dates: 33.4%
  • Crypto
    Crypto, High wave trade: 34.5%
    Crypto, Same trade, random dates: 33.0%
  • US stocks
    US stocks, High wave trade: 33.4%
    US stocks, Same trade, random dates: 33.3%
  • Forex
    Forex, High wave trade: 33.7%
    Forex, Same trade, random dates: 33.1%
  • ETFs
    ETFs, High wave trade: 34.1%
    ETFs, Same trade, random dates: 34.7%
  • Indices
    Indices, High wave trade: 36.8%
    Indices, Same trade, random dates: 38.3%
  • Commodities
    Commodities, High wave trade: 35.8%
    Commodities, Same trade, random dates: 35.8%
All statistics

Full results for the high wave candle, market by market

Every occurrence our rule finds on full price history, compared with what the same assets did on random bars. A pattern only earns an edge if it beats random entries after correcting for the thousands of tests we run.

Our verdict

As a 2:1 trade: Not a reliable signal on its own here. Use it as context, not as a trigger.

2:1 trade No clear edge

High wave: 789,764 occurrences tested

Neutral pattern · All markets · Daily · 2,358 assets · 1970-03 to 2026-10

2:1 trade hit the target
33.6%
vs 33.4% for the same trade on random dates
Average result per trade
0.00 R
vs 0.00 R on random dates

What this means. This pattern has no expected direction, so only the 2:1 trade is compared with the same trade on random dates. For the 2:1 trade: no measurable difference from the same trade on random dates on the same assets.

Timeline

Entry triggered, after the pattern
1 day · middle half 1 to 1 · on 789,350 triggered entries
Stop order beyond the pattern's extreme. 1,027 of these entries are not among the 788,323 trades: still open at the end of our data, or left out by the trade rules.
Time to the 2:1 target, when hit
3 days · middle half 1 to 6 · on 264,559 trades that hit it
Time to the stop, when hit
2 days · middle half 1 to 4 · on 522,713 trades that hit it
Time in the trade, all exits
2 days · middle half 1 to 5 · on 788,323 trades

Size and trade path

Pattern range, high to low
2.0% · middle half 1.4% to 3.1% · on 789,764 occurrences
Range vs average bar (ATR)
0.74× · middle half 0.59× to 0.93× · on 789,764 occurrences
Best open profit during the trade
0.98 R · middle half 0.23 R to 2.14 R · on 788,323 trades
Stopped trades that were first up 1 R
23.8% · on 522,713 stopped trades
Trades a stop moved to breakeven at +1 R would have closed flat instead of at a loss
Entry order triggered
99.9% · on 789,764 occurrences

Medians, each on the cases named on its line; "middle half" spans the 25th to 75th percentile; no value under 30 cases.

How we detect it. Short body with both shadows at least three times the body. Candlestick counts are not checked against planted examples, so they may not be exhaustive.

All measurements (20 rows)

2:1 trade: target hit and average result

R = initial risk of the trade. Entry by an order at the trigger level, filled at the open when a bar opens beyond it. Exit at the stop or the target, or at the open when a bar opens beyond either one; otherwise at the close after 100 bars. When one bar touches both the stop and the target, the loss is counted. No fees or slippage. n/a = not measured. Per trade: average result, against the same trade on random dates. Figures in gray: fewer than 30 closed trades, not interpreted.
MarketTradesTarget hitSame trade, random datesPer trade2:1 trade verdict
Crypto · 1-hour1,398,15731.5%33.6%−0.05 R vs +0.01 ROpposite of the textbook
Forex · 1-hour192,94931.9%32.3%−0.04 R vs −0.03 RWeak, below chance
All markets · 1-hour1,591,10631.6%33.4%−0.05 R vs +0.01 ROpposite of the textbook
Crypto · 4-hour374,13832.1%32.9%−0.03 R vs −0.01 RWeak, below chance
Forex · 4-hour48,99132.4%32.4%−0.03 R vs −0.03 RNo clear edge
All markets · 4-hour423,12932.1%32.8%−0.03 R vs −0.01 RWeak, below chance
Crypto · Daily59,02934.5%33.0%+0.04 R vs 0.00 RPromising
US stocks · Daily682,55533.4%33.3%−0.01 R vs −0.01 RNo clear edge
ETFs · Daily21,85034.1%34.7%0.00 R vs +0.02 RNo clear edge
Indices · Daily10,33936.8%38.3%+0.10 R vs +0.14 RWeak, below chance
Forex · Daily7,99533.7%33.1%+0.01 R vs −0.01 RNo clear edge
Commodities · Daily6,55535.8%35.8%+0.06 R vs +0.07 RNo clear edge
All markets · Daily788,32333.6%33.4%0.00 R vs 0.00 RNo clear edge
Crypto · Weekly6,57637.4%32.7%+0.13 R vs −0.01 RPromising
US stocks · Weekly121,52033.5%33.5%0.00 R vs +0.01 RNo clear edge
ETFs · Weekly4,03733.3%35.0%0.00 R vs +0.05 RWeak, below chance
Indices · Weekly1,97334.5%34.9%+0.04 R vs +0.05 RNo clear edge
Forex · Weekly1,48531.8%31.9%−0.04 R vs −0.04 RNo clear edge
Commodities · Weekly1,25635.8%35.2%+0.07 R vs +0.05 RNo clear edge
All markets · Weekly136,84733.7%33.5%+0.01 R vs +0.01 RNo clear edge

Data updated November 5, 2026 · code version c2a1683f · Read the methodology. We measure every pattern on crypto and forex (1-hour, 4-hour, daily and weekly charts) and US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities (daily and weekly charts). A market or timeframe from that list missing from the tables above had no occurrence.

What you often read

“The high wave candle signals indecision before a big move.”

What our data shows

On 788,323 daily closed trades, the 2:1 trade taken on the side of the first breakout hit its target 33.6% of the time, against 33.4% for the same trade on random dates: no clear edge, since the average result per trade is not statistically significant.

Table quoted in the text (verdicts and every market: see All measurements)
Market and timeframeClosed trades2:1 target hitSame setup, random datesExpectancyRandom datesVerdict
All markets, daily788,32333.6%33.4%0.00 R0.00 RNo clear edge
US stocks, daily682,55533.4%33.3%−0.01 R−0.01 RNo clear edge
Crypto, daily59,02934.5%33.0%+0.04 R0.00 RPromising
Crypto, hourly1,398,15731.5%33.6%−0.05 R+0.01 RWorse than chance
Forex, hourly192,94931.9%32.3%−0.04 R−0.03 RWeak, below chance
Indices, daily10,33936.8%38.3%+0.10 R+0.14 RWeak, below chance
Crypto, weekly6,57637.4%32.7%+0.13 R−0.01 RPromising
All markets, weekly136,84733.7%33.5%+0.01 R+0.01 RNo clear edge

Read the table in pairs of columns, one market at a time. On daily charts across all markets, the setup reached its 2:1 target in 33.6% of cases, against 33.4% for the same entry, stop and target on random dates, with an expectancy of 0.00 R per trade before costs. The pattern did not add anything to the trading result.

There is no confirmed positive exception, a few results that pass a simple test only, and one negative result that survives our correction, hourly crypto, plus the all-markets hourly row that it dominates. On daily crypto charts, the setup reached its target in 34.5% of cases against 33.0% on random dates, a gap that passes a simple test but not our correction for multiple testing (promising). The expectancy is +0.04 R before costs, small enough that fees and slippage could absorb much of it. On hourly crypto charts, the setup did slightly worse than chance, a difference that holds after our correction for multiple testing; on hourly forex, 4-hour crypto and weekly ETFs (0.00 R against +0.05 R on random dates), it did slightly worse too, but those gaps do not survive the correction. Weekly crypto charts looked better still (37.4% against 32.7%, +0.13 R), but on 6,576 trades that result does not survive our correction for multiple testing: it is rated promising, not proven. Daily indices also did a little worse than random dates (+0.10 R against +0.14 R, rated weak, below chance), a gap that passes a simple test only. Daily forex (33.7% against 33.1%) and commodities (35.8% against 35.8%, +0.06 R against +0.07 R) read no clear edge. Commodity results come from continuous futures that are not adjusted at contract rolls; the bench cuts each series at the large price jumps those rolls leave. The full method is in our methodology.

Real examples of the high wave candlestick pattern

The gallery of this section shows real cases, picked by our bench across markets (best and worst results, textbook shapes, most recent cases and typical draws, where a market has them), with their actual outcome. The cases written up below are on daily crypto charts.

Real occurrences from our test bench, each on its market's main timeframe. Crypto and US stock examples come from liquid assets only (the largest coins, the most traded stocks). Best and Worst are the best and worst 2:1 trade results, Textbook the cleanest shapes (chosen on geometry alone, never on the outcome), Most recent the latest detections among the assets the gallery draws from, Typical a random draw. Shaded area: the pattern. Dashed lines: entry, stop loss (SL) and 2:1 target (TP) of the tested trade. Dotted line: 10 bars after the signal. A result above +2 R or below −1 R means a bar opened past the target or the stop, and the trade was closed at that open. Stock and ETF prices are adjusted for splits and dividends, so they can differ from the prices quoted at the time. We left out 39 cards: 1 with a bar far out of line with the bars around it (a likely bad quote), 28 with a shape that does not read as the definition on this page, 6 with an overnight jump that may be a switch between two futures contracts, 4 with a candle that is the thin first bar of the trading week. They still count in the statistics, and are not replaced: our bench picks a fixed number of cards per category.

Market
Examples
Crypto overallAcross 1,399,030 high wave occurrences on 1-hour charts (1,398,157 closed trades), the 2:1 trade hit its target 31.5% of the time, against 33.6% for the same trade on random dates.Opposite of the textbookThe examples below are single cases.
◂ Pattern0.27540.2695+10 barsTPSLEntry2025-06
Best tradeXLM June 2, 20251-hour chartPrice rose 2.9% after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.04 R
◂ Pattern9.168.59+10 barsTPSLEntry2026-10
Worst tradeAVAX October 28, 20261-hour chartPrice rose 1.6% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
◂ Pattern16.5715.11+10 barsTPSLEntry2023-12
TextbookLINK December 24, 20231-hour chartPrice fell 0.1% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
◂ Pattern0.37060.3485+10 barsTPSLEntry2023-05
TextbookADA May 12, 20231-hour chartPrice fell 0.3% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
◂ Pattern246.2225.3+10 barsTPSLEntry2025-092025-09
TypicalSOL September 12, 20251-hour chartPrice rose 0.8% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
◂ Pattern160.3144.6+10 barsTPSLEntry2022-01
TypicalAAVE January 29, 20221-hour chartPrice fell 0.3% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
Examples
US stocks overallAcross 683,444 daily high wave occurrences (682,555 closed trades), the 2:1 trade hit its target 33.4% of the time, against 33.3% for the same trade on random dates. The average result per trade does not pass our significance test.No clear edgeThe examples below are single cases.
◂ Pattern98.2977.38+10 barsTPSLEntry2024-01
Worst tradeDELL February 26, 2024Daily chartPrice rose 24.9% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −10.30 RAfter the pattern, price left the chart: high 126.0 on March 1, 2024.
◂ Pattern32.5828.36+10 barsTPSLEntry2016-12
TextbookVZ January 10, 2017Daily chartPrice fell 5.7% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −2.54 R
◂ Pattern37.6834.39+10 barsTPSLEntry2007-032007-05
TextbookPG March 30, 2007Daily chartPrice rose 0.9% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
Examples
Forex overallAcross 193,259 high wave occurrences on 1-hour charts (192,949 closed trades), the 2:1 trade hit its target 31.9% of the time, against 32.3% for the same trade on random dates.Weak, below chanceThe examples below are single cases.
◂ Pattern1.221.16+10 barsTPSLEntry2020-03
TextbookGBP/USD March 26, 20201-hour chartPrice rose 2.6% after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.00 R
◂ Pattern1.661.64+10 barsTPSLEntry2022-072022-07
TextbookEUR/NZD July 7, 20221-hour chartPrice fell 0.4% after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.00 R
◂ Pattern0.98650.9814TPSLEntry2026-102026-10
Most recentAUD/CAD October 23, 20261-hour chart2:1 trade: in progress
◂ Pattern112.3111.4TPSLEntry2026-102026-10
Most recentCAD/JPY October 23, 20261-hour chart2:1 trade: in progress
◂ Pattern1.071.06+10 barsTPSLEntry2015-03
TypicalEUR/CHF March 11, 20151-hour chartPrice fell 0.5% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
Examples
ETFs overallAcross 21,874 daily high wave occurrences (21,850 closed trades), the 2:1 trade hit its target 34.1% of the time, against 34.7% for the same trade on random dates. The average result per trade does not pass our significance test.No clear edgeThe examples below are single cases.
◂ Pattern43.9035.97+10 barsTPSLEntry2026-09
Best tradeEWZ October 1, 2026Daily chartPrice rose 12.0% after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +5.78 R
◂ Pattern36.3434.04+10 barsTPSLEntry2025-03
Worst tradeEWU April 1, 2025Daily chartPrice fell 2.1% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −5.14 RAfter the pattern, price left the chart: low 31.05 on April 9, 2025.
◂ Pattern25.4123.97+10 barsTPSLEntry2017-11
TextbookXLRE December 1, 2017Daily chartPrice rose 0.1% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
◂ Pattern24.3319.45+10 barsTPSLEntry2008-08
TextbookXLV September 17, 2008Daily chartPrice fell 1.8% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −2.19 R
◂ Pattern51.9047.81TPSLEntry2026-092026-10
Most recentXLB October 16, 2026Daily chart2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
◂ Pattern22.5217.77+10 barsTPSLEntry2000-01
TypicalXLK February 22, 2000Daily chartPrice rose 6.3% after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.00 R
◂ Pattern106.5297.49+10 barsTPSLEntry2016-06
TypicalTLT June 30, 2016Daily chartPrice fell 0.2% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
Examples
Indices overallAcross 10,349 daily high wave occurrences (10,339 closed trades), the 2:1 trade hit its target 36.8% of the time, against 38.3% for the same trade on random dates.Weak, below chanceThe examples below are single cases.
◂ Pattern384.2353.0+10 barsTPSLEntry1990-12
Best tradeNasdaq Composite January 14, 1991Daily chartPrice rose 11.5% after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +3.58 RAfter the pattern, price left the chart: high 424.9 on February 4, 1991.
◂ Pattern445.2408.1+10 barsTPSLEntry1989-04
Worst tradeNasdaq Composite May 5, 1989Daily chartPrice rose 2.6% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.83 R
◂ Pattern19,71218,256+10 barsTPSLEntry2012-11
TextbookBSE Sensex December 6, 2012Daily chartPrice fell 0.2% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
◂ Pattern325.6295.3+10 barsTPSLEntry1985-11
TextbookNasdaq Composite December 5, 1985Daily chartPrice rose 1.4% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.27 R
◂ Pattern5,1834,706+10 barsTPSLEntry2024-11
TypicalEuro Stoxx 50 December 20, 2024Daily chartPrice rose 1.9% after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.00 R
◂ Pattern1,1441,061+10 barsTPSLEntry2004-06
TypicalS&P 500 July 28, 2004Daily chartPrice fell 1.8% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
Examples
Commodities overallAcross 6,589 daily high wave occurrences (6,555 closed trades), the 2:1 trade hit its target 35.8% of the time, against 35.8% for the same trade on random dates. The average result per trade does not pass our significance test.No clear edgeThe examples below are single cases.
◂ Pattern569.3484.8+10 barsTPSLEntry2021-092021-10
TextbookCorn futures September 30, 2021Daily chartPrice fell 3.7% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
◂ Pattern117.1596.56TPSLEntry2026-092026-10
Most recentBrent crude oil futures October 20, 2026Daily chart2:1 trade: in progress
◂ Pattern2.612.26+10 barsTPSLEntry2021-09
TypicalHeating oil futures October 28, 2021Daily chartPrice fell 2.8% after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.00 R
◂ Pattern1,056.5965.3+10 barsTPSLEntry2018-04
TypicalSoybean futures May 15, 2018Daily chartPrice rose 0.4% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
◂ Pattern2,4492,025+10 barsTPSLEntry2024-02
TypicalGold futures March 21, 2024Daily chartPrice rose 7.4% after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R

A short that went the right way, then was stopped

On April 26, 2025, after a rise from 1.912 on April 16, NEAR/USDT printed one: open at 2.620, close at 2.623, a body of only 0.003, with an upper shadow of 0.106 up to 2.729 and a lower shadow of 0.071 down to 2.549. The next day price broke the bottom of the candle, which opened a short at 2.549 with a stop at 2.729 and a 2:1 target at 2.189. Price slid to 2.223 on May 7, about 1.8 R in favor of the trade and just short of the target, then rebounded to 2.743 on May 8 and hit the stop. Ten days after the candle, NEAR was 11.2% lower, yet the position lost 1 R.

A break that was stopped

On August 25, 2019, BTC/USDT printed one between 9,906.97 and 10,333. The next day price broke the top, opening the position at 10,333, then fell through the bottom of the candle on August 28: a full 1 R loss in three sessions. BTC was nevertheless 4.2% higher 10 days after the candle.

The move came, then the stop

On January 15, 2021, DOGE/USDT printed one between 0.0083123 and 0.0098443. Price stayed inside that range until January 21, when it broke the bottom and opened a short at 0.0083123. DOGE was 10.7% lower 10 days after the candle, but on January 28 it traded up to 0.0374849 in a single session, far above the stop at 0.0098443: the position lost 1 R.

Comparison with similar candles

Compared with the spinning top

The spinning top looks the same but has shorter shadows. On daily charts, its setup reached the 2:1 target in 33.4% of cases against 33.4% on random dates: the same result.

Compared with the long-legged doji

The long-legged doji has long shadows and almost no body: open and close are nearly equal. Our rule only asks for a short body, so a doji with long enough shadows also counts. On daily charts, the long-legged doji setup reached its target in 33.2% of cases, almost exactly like random dates. The rickshaw man is a long-legged doji with its body near the middle of the range.

Compared with the doji

A standard doji has almost no body and no shadow requirement. It also did slightly better than chance on daily crypto charts, rated Promising, though not after our correction: 34.0% of targets hit against 32.6% on random dates.

Advantages of the high wave candlestick pattern

  • Easy to identify: one candle, three clear conditions.
  • Clear levels: the high and low of the candle give the entry and the stop.
  • Available in every financial market and timeframe, about once every 11 bars.

Limitations and risks of the high wave pattern

  • It has no direction: it tells you the market is undecided, not where price will go.
  • On most markets and timeframes we tested, the break-out setup did not beat chance, and on hourly crypto charts it did slightly worse, a gap confirmed after our correction for multiple testing.
  • Trades are short: the median stopped trade lasted 2 bars on daily charts.

Tools and scanners for high wave candles

Charting platforms with a candlestick scanner can flag the pattern automatically. In ThinkorSwim, you can write a short thinkScript condition (body smaller than the recent average, both shadows more than twice the body) and use it in a scan or as a chart study. TradingView users can do the same in Pine Script, and stock screeners with custom scans can apply the same condition. Check the definition your tool uses: thresholds for "small body" and "long shadow" differ, and so do the results.

Frequently asked questions

Is the high wave candlestick bullish or bearish?

Neither. It is an indecision pattern. A green candle is not bullish and a red one is not bearish: the direction only comes from the next break of its high or low.

Can I use this pattern for intraday trading?

Yes, the pattern definition is the same on every timeframe, and it is common in intraday trading. But on hourly charts, our results were weaker than on daily charts: on hourly crypto charts, the break-out setup did slightly worse than the same trade on random dates, a gap that holds after our correction for multiple testing; on hourly currency pairs it was also slightly worse, but not after the correction.

What happens when the setup fails?

The setup fails when price breaks one extreme, then reverses through the other one. On daily charts, the median losing trade was stopped within 2 bars.

Summary of key points

  • The candle has a small real body and two shadows each more than twice its length. It signals indecision, not direction.
  • It is common: about once every 11 bars on daily and hourly charts.
  • On 788,323 closed trades on daily occurrences, the break-out setup reached its 2:1 target in 33.6% of cases, against 33.4% for the same trade on random dates.
  • Daily crypto charts did slightly better than chance (+0.04 R before costs), without surviving our correction for multiple testing; hourly crypto did slightly worse than chance.
  • Volume, the prior trend and the 200-day moving average changed the results only slightly.

Treat it as a pause in the market to note, not as a trading signal to act on alone. In technical analysis, it is best read with the levels around it. Define the stop at the other extreme before entry, size the position on that distance and keep the risk per trade small. Results measured on past data do not guarantee future results, and this page is educational content, not personal financial advice.

About the author and the data. Written by Amaury, founder of PatternsWizard, who is passionate about finance, quantitative trading and data analysis. He built the PatternsWizard test bench, which detects each setup with fixed, published rules on full market history: crypto, forex, US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities. Trades and win rates are compared with random bars on the same assets, excess returns with the rest of the market, with error margins and a correction for multiple testing, and the whole pipeline is checked on random-walk prices, where nothing can be predicted. Statistics on this page were generated on November 5, 2026. The full methodology explains every step.

, Founder of PatternsWizard

Passionate about finance, quantitative trading and data analysis. Amaury built the PatternsWizard test bench, which detects each pattern on full price history and measures what happened next against random entries.

Statistics on this page come from our open methodology: every occurrence our rule finds on full history, compared with chance. How we test patterns.

179 patterns testedRandom-walk self-test passed