Pattern direction

CandlestickBullish abandoned babyBearish abandoned baby

Abandoned Baby Candlestick Pattern: Rules, Trading and Tested Results

A doji cut off from both neighbors by two gaps: the abandoned baby is one of the rarest reversal candles. This guide gives the exact rule, real examples, and what our bench measured on every daily occurrence our rule finds against random dates: too few cases to measure an edge in either direction.

· Founder of PatternsWizard
Updated Statistics updated 16 min read
Occurrences tested
41
4 markets, 1985 to 2026, found by code
Bullish abandoned baby: textbook says price should rise
Too close to call
−1.24% in the expected direction vs the market after 10 bars, all markets, daily
Bearish abandoned baby: textbook says price should fall
Too close to call
+1.54% in the expected direction vs the market after 10 bars, all markets, daily

How we tested this pattern

Sample
41 occurrences on 4 markets (US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities), 1985 to 2026.
Detection
Found by code, never picked by hand: every match of the rule on full price history, winners and losers alike.bullish abandoned baby pattern: After a downtrend: a long black candle, a doji gapping entirely below it (price gap), then a white candle gapping entirely above the doji and closing at least 30% into the black body. Any gap counts, even one tick. A long body is at least 1.3 times the average body of the 10 candles before the pattern and at least 0.6 times the largest of them.bearish abandoned baby pattern: After an uptrend: a long white candle, a doji gapping entirely above it (price gap), then a black candle gapping entirely below the doji and closing at least 30% into the white body. Any gap counts, even one tick. A long body is at least 1.3 times the average body of the 10 candles before the pattern and at least 0.6 times the largest of them.
Benchmark
Each occurrence is compared with the same assets on random bars: the move 10 bars later, and a 2:1 reward-to-risk trade.
Checks
Block bootstrap and a correction for the thousands of tests we run, plus a random-walk self-test that the bench passes: on random prices, no pattern should win.

Every pattern's results on one sheet

The only pattern cheat sheet with tested stats: 152 patterns, what the textbook says and what really happened on 6 markets. Free PDF, sent to your inbox.

One email with the PDF, then a note when a result changes. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.

At a glance: what textbooks say, what we measured
Pattern
Bullish abandoned baby
Occurrences tested
20 occurrences, all markets, daily
Textbook: price should rise after it
Too close to call · −1.24% vs the market, 10 bars
Verdict
10-bar move: Not enough data2:1 trade: Not enough data
Pattern
Bearish abandoned baby
Occurrences tested
21 occurrences, all markets, daily
Textbook: price should fall after it
Too close to call · +1.54% vs the market, 10 bars
Verdict
10-bar move: Not enough data2:1 trade: Not enough data

See the statistics

On this page
  1. What is the abandoned baby candlestick pattern?
  2. How to identify the abandoned baby pattern
  3. Why it is so rare, and absent from crypto and forex
  4. Key differences between abandoned baby and morning/evening star patterns
  5. Why this pattern signals a trend reversal
  6. How to trade the abandoned baby pattern
  7. Using technical indicators for confirmation
  8. Risk management and stop-loss placement
  9. Reliability and success rates
  10. Real examples on daily charts
  11. Limitations and common pitfalls to avoid
  12. Tools to find the pattern
  13. Frequently asked questions
  14. Summary of key points
  15. Final thoughts on risk management

The abandoned baby candlestick pattern is a rare three-candle reversal pattern: a long candle in the direction of the trend, a doji separated from it by a price gap, shadows included, then a candle in the opposite direction, separated by a second gap. The middle candle is left alone on the chart, like an island, which gives the formation its name. In simple terms, the pattern represents a sudden change of direction: a strong move, a pause, then a strong move the other way.

This guide will help you learn how to identify both versions, why the setup is read as a trend reversal, how traders enter, place a stop-loss and take profit, and what happened after it in actual markets. Our test bench scanned full price history on stocks, ETFs, indices, commodities, crypto and forex. It found only 20 bullish and 21 bearish occurrences on daily charts, and compared each one with random dates on the same assets.

What is the abandoned baby candlestick pattern?

This candlestick pattern is a three-bar reversal signal. Steve Nison, who introduced Japanese candlestick charting to Western traders in Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991), presents it as a rare form of the doji star: the middle candle is a doji whose shadows do not overlap the shadows of the candles on either side. In Western technical analysis, the closest equivalent is the island reversal, where a group of bars is isolated by a gap on each side.

On a chart, the pattern looks like a lone doji floating between a long candle and a candle in the opposite direction. There are two versions. The bullish abandoned baby appears after a downtrend and signals a potential upward reversal. The bearish abandoned baby appears after an uptrend and signals a potential downward move. Both say the same thing in technical analysis terms: the market moved hard in one direction, stalled, and then moved hard in the other direction, leaving the middle session stranded. This does not mean the trend must turn; it means momentum has stalled and a potential trend reversal is possible.

Our bench follows the rule of the open-source TA-Lib library (CDLABANDONEDBABY), without its minimum size for the third candle: a long first candle, a doji separated from it by a full price gap, and a third candle separated from the doji by a full price gap in the other direction, closing at least 30% of the way into the body of the first candle.

How to identify the abandoned baby pattern

Check four things in order: the trend before the pattern, the first candle, the middle candle and its two windows (the Japanese term for a gap), and the close of the third candle.

Structure of a bullish abandoned baby

  • Trend: prices have been falling. Our rule requires a downtrend before the first candle.
  • Candle 1: a long black candle, in the direction of the decline.
  • Candle 2: a doji, with an opening and closing price nearly equal, whose high is below the low of candle 1. The doji indicates indecision after the decline.
  • Candle 3: a white candle, of any size, whose low is above the high of the doji, closing at least 30% into the body of candle 1.

The figure below is not drawn by hand. It is the median shape of the occurrences our bench detected, with the faded candles showing the decline before the pattern and the levels we test: entry above the pattern high, stop-loss under the doji low, target at twice the risk.

Structure of a bearish abandoned baby

  • Trend: prices have been rising before the first candle.
  • Candle 1: a long white candle that extends the uptrend.
  • Candle 2: a doji whose low is above the high of candle 1, with an opening price above the previous close.
  • Candle 3: a black candle, of any size, whose high is below the low of the doji, closing at least 30% into the body of candle 1.

The bearish abandoned baby pattern is the mirror image. Here the test sells below the pattern low, with the stop-loss above the doji high.

Size of the pattern

On the median daily occurrence, the three candles span 5.51% of price for the bullish version and 5.30% for the bearish one, about two times the average true range (ATR) of the asset (2.17 and 2.60 ATR). The formation is large, so the stop is far from the entry.

Why it is so rare, and absent from crypto and forex

Two full gaps in a row are unusual for any candlestick pattern. On daily charts, our bench found one bullish pattern every 382,474 eligible bars and one bearish every 367,195. For comparison, the morning star, which only needs the star to clear the body, appears once every 2,592 daily bars. Most occurrences come from the stock market: 15 of the 20 bullish and 14 of the 21 bearish daily cases are US stocks, where each session opens after a night of news.

Crypto and forex are continuous markets. Bitcoin trades around the clock, currency pairs trade 24 hours on weekdays, and a new candle almost always opens where the previous one closed. Without a jump between sessions, the middle candle cannot be isolated. With its strict definition, our bench found no occurrence at all in forex market data, and none on crypto charts either, whether daily, 4-hour or hourly, on hundreds of coins. If a forex or crypto chart shows one, check whether the gap is real or an artifact of a low-volume session or a data feed.

Key differences between abandoned baby and morning/evening star patterns

This candlestick pattern belongs to the same family as the morning star and the evening star. The difference is how far the middle candle is separated.

  • Morning and evening star: the middle candle (the star) has a small body that gaps beyond the body of the first candle. Shadows can overlap.
  • Doji star: the star is a doji, but only two candles are needed, and the shadows can still overlap.
  • Abandoned baby: the star is a doji and nothing overlaps, neither bodies nor shadows, on both sides.

Every occurrence is therefore also a morning or evening doji star, but very few doji stars are abandoned babies. The island reversal follows the same logic with one or more bars of any shape isolated by two windows. On our data, the more demanding definition leaves too few cases to measure any advantage: see the reliability section below.

Why this pattern signals a trend reversal

To understand the signal, follow the price action over three sessions of the bullish version. Sellers are in control and push prices downward on a long black candle, a sign that the decline continues. The next session opens lower again, but the selling stalls: the doji shows buyers and sellers in balance for a moment, far below the prior day. Then the third session opens above the baby and rallies. In the classic reading, traders who sold on the gap down are now losing, and their buying to cover adds to the upward move. The shift in market sentiment is visible on the chart itself, indicating that the other side has taken control.

The bearish version tells the opposite story, with a downward shift in sentiment: buyers push a strong white candle, the next session opens higher but goes nowhere, then the market opens lower and sellers take over, leaving late buyers trapped above.

That reading is plausible, and it is why the rule asks the third candle to close well inside the first body. But it describes three sessions; whether they change the trend is a question for data. The reliability section shows what happened next.

How to trade the abandoned baby pattern

The classic approach for the bullish setup is to buy when prices trade above the high of the pattern, with a stop-loss under the low of the doji and a target set as a multiple of the risk. For the bearish setup, sell below the pattern low, with the stop above the doji high. This is what our bench simulates on every occurrence, with a target at twice the risk (2:1).

Bullish only

A real case from our bench: US stocksThe only example card our bench gives on this market, the one in the gallery: not a ranked pick. Stock prices are adjusted for splits and dividends, so they can differ from the prices quoted at the time.

◂ Pattern52.3736.85+10 barsTPSLEntry2019-07
GE August 13, 2019Daily chart15.2% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry

Conservative entry strategy

Two entry options exist. The conservative trader places a buy stop just above the highest point of the three candles and waits for prices to trade through it. This is the version we measured. On daily charts, the bullish entry was triggered on 85.0% of occurrences; in 15.0% of cases, the doji low broke first and the setup was canceled before any trade; a setup that touches neither level within the 20 bars the order stays active, or before the data end, expires, and none did here. For the bearish version, 76.2% triggered and 23.8% were canceled.

Aggressive entry strategy

The aggressive trader chooses to enter at the close of the third candle, as soon as possible once the pattern is complete. The entry is closer to the stop and the position is larger for the same risk, but there is no confirmation: you are in the trade even in the cases where the conservative order would never have filled. We have not tested this version separately.

Profit targets

A target at twice the risk is the version we test. Because the pattern is about two ATR wide, that target sits far away. On daily charts, only 7 bullish trades reached it and 10 were stopped, too few to give a useful median time. Some traders take profit at the last high or low before the pattern instead, based on the previous structure of the chart.

Using technical indicators for confirmation

Can a technical indicator confirm the signal? Here is what we tested and what we did not.

Combining with volume analysis

One rule wants high trading volume on the third candle, as a sign that the new side is committed, with the next candle expected to confirm the move. Our data cannot test it: with only 20 bullish and 21 bearish daily occurrences, the bench does not split them by volume, since each group would hold a handful of cases.

Using relative strength index (RSI) for verification

Another filter wants the relative strength index (RSI) below 30 (oversold) before a bullish setup, or above 70 (overbought) before a bearish one, and some add a MACD crossover that confirms the signal. We have not tested an RSI or MACD filter on this pattern. With so few occurrences, any filter shrinks the sample further: test it on your own market before relying on it.

Moving average trend filter

We split daily occurrences by the position of prices relative to the 200-day moving average. With so few occurrences, the bench does not report this split for the abandoned baby: each group would be far below the 30 cases needed to read a rate.

Risk management and stop-loss placement

  • Size the position on the distance from entry to stop. The pattern is about two ATR wide, so a standard position size would risk too much.
  • Expect gaps against you. A market that jumped twice in three sessions can jump again, and a stop order fills at the next available price, not at your level: a loss can then exceed 1 R.
  • Plan the management. A trade can move well in your favor and still come back to the stop, as the natural gas ETF (UNG) case in the failed setups below shows.
  • Keep the risk per trade small: one pattern is not a reason to concentrate a trading account, and a written trading plan helps you stick to it.

Reliability and success rates

The abandoned baby candlestick pattern is too rare to prove anything on its own. With only 20 bullish and 21 bearish daily occurrences, every row, US stocks included, is below the 30 cases our bench needs before reading a result: the numbers below are shown, not interpreted. Here are the numbers from our test bench, before fees and other trading costs.

All statistics

Full results for the abandoned baby candlestick pattern, market by market

Every occurrence our rule finds on full price history, compared with what the same assets did on random bars. A pattern only earns an edge if it beats random entries after correcting for the thousands of tests we run.

Our verdict

Too rare to judge yet: fewer than 30 occurrences, or too few independent periods to test.

10-bar move Not enough data2:1 trade Not enough data

Bullish abandoned baby: 20 occurrences tested

Bullish pattern · All markets · Daily · 19 assets · 1987-04 to 2023-06

Moved the expected way after 10 bars
60.0%
vs 55.1% on random bars
Only 20 occurrences, fewer than 30: not interpreted
Excess return vs its market, 10 bars
−1.24%
95% interval −5.05% to +1.70%
Only 20 occurrences, fewer than 30: not interpreted
its market−6%+6%
2:1 trade hit the target
41.2%
vs 30.4% for the same trade on random dates
Only 17 closed trades, fewer than 30: not interpreted
Average result per trade
+0.18 R
vs +0.01 R on random dates
Only 17 closed trades, fewer than 30: not interpreted

What this means. Fewer than 30 occurrences, or too few independent periods to test: the numbers are shown but not interpreted.

Timeline

Entry triggered, after the pattern
too few to measure · on 17 triggered entries
Stop order beyond the pattern's extreme.
Time to the 2:1 target, when hit
too few to measure · on 7 trades that hit it
Time to the stop, when hit
too few to measure · on 10 trades that hit it
Time in the trade, all exits
too few to measure · on 17 trades

Size and trade path

Pattern range, high to low
too few to measure · on 20 occurrences
Range vs average bar (ATR)
too few to measure · on 20 occurrences
Best open profit during the trade
too few to measure · on 17 trades
Stopped trades that were first up 1 R
too few to measure · on 10 stopped trades
Trades a stop moved to breakeven at +1 R would have closed flat instead of at a loss
Entry order triggered
too few to measure · on 20 occurrences

Medians, each on the cases named on its line; "middle half" spans the 25th to 75th percentile; no value under 30 cases.

How we detect it. After a downtrend: a long black candle, a doji gapping entirely below it (price gap), then a white candle gapping entirely above the doji and closing at least 30% into the black body. Any gap counts, even one tick. A long body is at least 1.3 times the average body of the 10 candles before the pattern and at least 0.6 times the largest of them. Candlestick counts are not checked against planted examples, so they may not be exhaustive.

All measurements (4 rows)

10-bar move: did price go the expected way?

Figures in gray: fewer than 30 occurrences, not interpreted. Excess return is signed so that positive favors the pattern. The test uses the bootstrap’s standard error and the interval its percentiles: near the 0.05 line, or on a few extreme moves, an interval can leave out zero while the test does not pass, and the test decides. Stock data misses most delisted companies, a survivorship bias we have not sized, which can flatter stock rows.
MarketOccurrencesPatternRandom barsExcess10-bar move verdict
US stocks · Daily1553.3%54.8%−1.43%Not enough data
ETFs · Daily475.0%57.4%−1.42%Not enough data
Commodities · Daily1100.0%50.9%+2.34%Not enough data
All markets · Daily2060.0%55.1%−1.24%Not enough data

2:1 trade: target hit and average result

R = initial risk of the trade. Entry by an order at the trigger level, filled at the open when a bar opens beyond it. Exit at the stop or the target, or at the open when a bar opens beyond either one; otherwise at the close after 100 bars. When one bar touches both the stop and the target, the loss is counted. No fees or slippage. n/a = not measured. Per trade: average result, against the same trade on random dates. Figures in gray: fewer than 30 closed trades, not interpreted.
MarketTradesTarget hitSame trade, random datesPer trade2:1 trade verdict
US stocks · Daily1353.8%35.9%+0.55 R vs +0.14 RNot enough data
ETFs · Daily40.0%12.5%−1.00 R vs −0.40 RNot enough data
Commodities · Daily0n/an/an/a vs n/aNot enough data
All markets · Daily1741.2%30.4%+0.18 R vs +0.01 RNot enough data

Our verdict

Too rare to judge yet: fewer than 30 occurrences, or too few independent periods to test.

10-bar move Not enough data2:1 trade Not enough data

Bearish abandoned baby: 21 occurrences tested

Bearish pattern · All markets · Daily · 21 assets · 1985-04 to 2026-01

Moved the expected way after 10 bars
47.6%
vs 45.7% on random bars
Only 21 occurrences, fewer than 30: not interpreted
Excess return vs its market, 10 bars
+1.54%
95% interval −0.87% to +4.43%
Excess return is signed so that positive favors the pattern. On a bearish setup, it means the asset lagged its market.
Only 21 occurrences, fewer than 30: not interpreted
its market−5%+5%
2:1 trade hit the target
50.0%
vs 26.0% for the same trade on random dates
Only 16 closed trades, fewer than 30: not interpreted
Average result per trade
+0.57 R
vs −0.11 R on random dates
Only 16 closed trades, fewer than 30: not interpreted

What this means. Fewer than 30 occurrences, or too few independent periods to test: the numbers are shown but not interpreted.

Timeline

Entry triggered, after the pattern
too few to measure · on 16 triggered entries
Stop order beyond the pattern's extreme.
Time to the 2:1 target, when hit
too few to measure · on 8 trades that hit it
Time to the stop, when hit
too few to measure · on 7 trades that hit it
Time in the trade, all exits
too few to measure · on 16 trades

Size and trade path

Pattern range, high to low
too few to measure · on 21 occurrences
Range vs average bar (ATR)
too few to measure · on 21 occurrences
Best open profit during the trade
too few to measure · on 16 trades
Stopped trades that were first up 1 R
too few to measure · on 7 stopped trades
Trades a stop moved to breakeven at +1 R would have closed flat instead of at a loss
Entry order triggered
too few to measure · on 21 occurrences

Medians, each on the cases named on its line; "middle half" spans the 25th to 75th percentile; no value under 30 cases.

How we detect it. After an uptrend: a long white candle, a doji gapping entirely above it (price gap), then a black candle gapping entirely below the doji and closing at least 30% into the white body. Any gap counts, even one tick. A long body is at least 1.3 times the average body of the 10 candles before the pattern and at least 0.6 times the largest of them. Candlestick counts are not checked against planted examples, so they may not be exhaustive.

All measurements (4 rows)

10-bar move: did price go the expected way?

Figures in gray: fewer than 30 occurrences, not interpreted. Excess return is signed so that positive favors the pattern. The test uses the bootstrap’s standard error and the interval its percentiles: near the 0.05 line, or on a few extreme moves, an interval can leave out zero while the test does not pass, and the test decides. Stock data misses most delisted companies, a survivorship bias we have not sized, which can flatter stock rows.
MarketOccurrencesPatternRandom barsExcess10-bar move verdict
US stocks · Daily1442.9%45.9%+1.07%Not enough data
ETFs · Daily666.7%45.8%+3.16%Not enough data
Indices · Daily10.0%43.2%−1.57%Not enough data
All markets · Daily2147.6%45.7%+1.54%Not enough data

2:1 trade: target hit and average result

R = initial risk of the trade. Entry by an order at the trigger level, filled at the open when a bar opens beyond it. Exit at the stop or the target, or at the open when a bar opens beyond either one; otherwise at the close after 100 bars. When one bar touches both the stop and the target, the loss is counted. No fees or slippage. n/a = not measured. Per trade: average result, against the same trade on random dates. Figures in gray: fewer than 30 closed trades, not interpreted.
MarketTradesTarget hitSame trade, random datesPer trade2:1 trade verdict
US stocks · Daily1050.0%30.0%+0.61 R vs −0.01 RNot enough data
ETFs · Daily560.0%23.3%+0.81 R vs −0.13 RNot enough data
Indices · Daily10.0%0.0%−1.00 R vs −1.01 RNot enough data
All markets · Daily1650.0%26.0%+0.57 R vs −0.11 RNot enough data

Data updated November 5, 2026 · code version c2a1683f · Read the methodology. No occurrence on crypto or forex in our data. The bearish abandoned baby had no occurrence on commodities. The bullish abandoned baby had no occurrence on indices. We measure every pattern on crypto and forex (1-hour, 4-hour, daily and weekly charts) and US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities (daily and weekly charts). A market or timeframe from that list missing from the tables above had no occurrence.

Table quoted in the text (verdicts and every market: see All measurements)
Setup and market (daily)Occurrences (2:1 trades)Moved as expected after 10 barsRandom bars2:1 target hitSame trade, random datesExpectancy
Bullish, all markets20 (17)60.0%55.1%41.2%30.4%+0.18 R (random +0.01 R)
Bullish, US stocks15 (13)53.3%54.8%53.8%35.9%+0.55 R (random +0.14 R)
Bearish, all markets21 (16)47.6%45.7%50.0%26.0%+0.57 R (random −0.11 R)
Bearish, US stocks14 (10)42.9%45.9%50.0%30.0%+0.61 R (random −0.01 R)

Read the table in pairs of columns to understand what the numbers indicate. "Moved as expected" means followed by a higher price 10 sessions later for the bullish version and lower for the bearish one. 60.0% of bullish occurrences were higher 10 days later, against 55.1% of random days on the same assets: random days rise more often than they fall, so the comparison matters more than the raw figure. The average excess return over the rest of the market after 10 bars was −1.24%, with a 95% confidence interval from −5.05% to +1.70%: a range this wide, on so few cases, says nothing either way.

The 2:1 setup is just as thin. The bullish setup reached its target in 41.2% of 17 trades, against 30.4% for the same entry, stop and target on random dates, for an expectancy of +0.18 R per trade before costs. The bearish setup reached its target in 50.0% of 16 trades, against 26.0% on random dates (+0.57 R against −0.11 R). On fewer than 30 trades, a few lucky or unlucky cases are enough to move these figures a long way: they are shown, not interpreted.

Two more warnings. On so few cases, the result also moves over time: the bullish excess return after 10 bars was −2.25% in the first half of the history and −0.23% in the second (a descriptive split, not in the tables). And every market, US stocks included, produced fewer than 30 occurrences: the statistics section lists them all as "Not enough data", a sign of how rare the pattern is. The full table, with every market and timeframe, is in that section, and the method is in our methodology.

These results agree with academic work on candlesticks: Marshall, Young and Rose, in "Candlestick technical trading strategies: Can they create value for investors?" (Journal of Banking & Finance, 2006), found that candlestick strategies did not add value on large US stocks.

Real examples on daily charts

The galleries in this section show real daily cases, picked by our bench (best and worst results, textbook shapes, most recent, random draws), with their actual outcome.

Real occurrences from our test bench, each on its market's main timeframe. Category cards on US stocks come from liquid assets only (the most traded stocks). Best and Worst are the best and worst 2:1 trade results, Most recent the latest detections among the assets the gallery draws from, Typical a random draw. Bullish abandoned baby pattern: on US stocks, our bench gives a single example card, so it carries no Best, Worst or other label: it is one real occurrence, not a ranked pick. Bearish abandoned baby pattern: on indices, our bench gives a single example card, so it carries no Best, Worst or other label: it is one real occurrence, not a ranked pick. Shaded area: the pattern. Dashed lines: entry, stop loss (SL) and 2:1 target (TP) of the tested trade. Dotted line: 10 bars after the signal. A result above +2 R or below −1 R means a bar opened past the target or the stop, and the trade was closed at that open. Stock and ETF prices are adjusted for splits and dividends, so they can differ from the prices quoted at the time.

Real occurrences 1 of the 15 occurrences on US stocks (daily charts)

US stocks overallAcross 15 daily bullish abandoned baby occurrences, too few cases to give a percentage (we need at least 30).Not enough dataThe example below is a single case.
◂ Pattern52.3736.85+10 barsTPSLEntry2019-07
GE August 13, 2019Daily chart15.2% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry
Market
Examples
ETFs overallAcross 6 daily bearish abandoned baby occurrences, too few cases to give a percentage (we need at least 30).Not enough dataThe examples below are single cases.
◂ Pattern16.2813.51+10 barsTPSLEntry2018-052018-08
Best tradeSLV June 15, 2018Daily chart2.9% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.04 R
◂ Pattern33.9531.42+10 barsTPSLEntry2019-08
Best tradeTypicalVEA September 16, 2019Daily chart0.3% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.00 R
◂ Pattern25.7021.83+10 barsTPSLEntry2022-032022-05
Worst tradeDBC April 19, 2022Daily chart0.5% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
◂ Pattern17.039.80+10 barsTPSLEntry2025-112026-02
Worst tradeMost recentTypicalUNG December 8, 2025Daily chart21.4% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
◂ Pattern269.8242.7+10 barsTPSLEntry2025-122026-03
Most recentTypicalIWM January 23, 2026Daily chart0.1% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.00 R
◂ Pattern50.5345.22+10 barsTPSLEntry2018-12
TypicalEFA January 22, 2019Daily chart3.7% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry

Real occurrences The only occurrence on indices (daily charts)

Indices overallAcross 1 daily bearish abandoned baby occurrence, too few cases to give a percentage (we need at least 30).Not enough dataThe example below is a single case.
◂ Pattern1,3331,236+10 barsTPSLEntry1985-03
FTSE 100 April 19, 1985Daily chart0.9% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R

A bullish setup that reached its target

On July 13, 2022, M&T Bank (MTB) printed a black candle. The next session was a doji whose high (131.90) stayed below the prior low (133.19). On July 15, the third candle opened above the doji, at 133.54, and closed at 136.38. On July 18, the share price opened above the pattern high, so the buy stop filled at 138.63, with a stop-loss at 129.91 under the doji and a target at 156.07. The target was reached on August 5, 2022, 14 sessions after entry, and MTB was 13.6% higher 10 sessions after the pattern.

A bearish setup that reached its target

On December 14, 2023, Ready Capital (RC) printed a doji whose low (8.66) sat above the high of the prior white candle (8.56). The next day the stock gapped down and closed at 8.26. The sell stop was triggered on December 18, with a stop at 8.85 and a target at 6.69, reached on February 28, 2024, 48 sessions after entry.

Failed setups

On December 8, 2025, the US natural gas ETF (UNG) completed a bearish pattern: a white candle that ended at 15.66, a doji at 16.37 whose low (16.30) sat above it, then a black candle that closed at 15.07. On December 9 the fund opened at 14.60, below the pattern low, so the sell stop filled there, with a stop at 17.00 above the doji and a target at 9.80. By January 15, 2026, the price had fallen as low as 9.95, about 1.9 R in favor and just short of the target, and it was 21.4% lower 10 sessions after the pattern, a very large move for this fund; it then rallied and hit the stop on January 30: a full 1 R loss.

In April 1985, the FTSE 100 printed a bearish pattern: a white session to 1,304.0, a doji whose low (1,305.4) stayed above it, then a black session that closed at 1,299.7. The index opened at 1,287.2 on April 23, below the 1,290.9 pattern low, so the short filled at that open, with a stop at 1,313.0. The index dipped only to 1,282.7, was 0.9% higher 10 sessions after the pattern, and hit the stop on May 7: a full 1 R loss. And on July 19, 2021, a bearish setup on Otter Tail (OTTR) was canceled before any trade: the share price never broke the pattern low and traded above the doji high on July 29.

Limitations and common pitfalls to avoid

  • Calling a morning star an abandoned baby. If a shadow of the doji overlaps a shadow of its neighbors, it is a doji star.
  • Seeing the pattern on 24-hour markets. On crypto and forex charts, an apparent window can come from a thin session or a data problem.
  • Trusting the rarity. Among candlestick patterns, a rare signal feels special, but rare also means too few cases to measure: our bench cannot rate either version.
  • Ignoring the size. The setup spans about two ATR: a position sized like any other risks twice as much.
  • Forgetting gap risk. A stop does not protect against a market that opens beyond it.

Pros and cons

The pros: a strict, objective definition of the candlestick pattern, easy to code and to check; a clear invalidation point beyond the doji; and the strictest definition in the doji star family. The cons: you will rarely see one, the stop is wide, and on our data both versions are too rare for the bench to measure their result per trade.

Tools to find the pattern

Stock screeners and charting platforms can flag candlestick patterns, and the open-source TA-Lib library provides the CDLABANDONEDBABY function our rule is based on, with a default penetration of 30% for the third candle. Check which definition your tool uses: some only require a gap between bodies, which counts some morning stars as abandoned babies and changes the results. A scanner across a large list of stocks is the only practical way to find this pattern: on US stocks, our bench found one bullish occurrence every 487,954 daily bars, more bars than the full daily history of any single stock in our data. Intraday charts did not help on our bench either: hourly crypto charts gave no occurrence at all, and we have no intraday stock data to test.

Frequently asked questions

How reliable is the abandoned baby pattern?

Our tests cannot say. On 17 closed trades on bullish daily occurrences, the 2:1 trade reached its target in 41.2% of cases against 30.4% on random dates, and on 16 bearish trades in 50.0% against 26.0%, but with fewer than 30 trades on each side these rates are shown, not interpreted.

Can this pattern be used in forex and crypto markets?

Rarely. These markets trade continuously, so a new candle opens where the last one closed and full gaps almost never happen. We found none in forex data and none on crypto charts, hourly ones included, so there is nothing to measure.

Is the pattern bullish or bearish?

Both versions exist. After a downtrend, with a black candle, a doji and a white candle, it is bullish. After an uptrend, with a white candle, a doji and a black candle, it is bearish: the bearish abandoned baby candlestick is the mirror image of the bullish one.

What does the pattern mean compared with a morning star candlestick?

In a morning star the body of the middle candle only needs to gap below the body of the first candle; shadows can overlap. In the bullish abandoned baby, the middle candle is a doji and its shadows do not overlap either neighbor.

Summary of key points

  • This candlestick pattern is a three-bar reversal signal: a long trend candle, an isolated doji, then a candle in the other direction, with nothing overlapping on either side of the doji.
  • It is very rare: one occurrence every 382,474 daily bars for the bullish version, against one every 2,592 for the morning star.
  • It is absent from our crypto and forex data: these markets trade continuously and rarely gap.
  • On 17 closed trades on bullish daily occurrences, the 2:1 trade reached its target 41.2% of the time against 30.4% on random dates, but fewer than 30 trades are too few to read a result.
  • The bearish version is just as rare: 21 daily occurrences and 16 closed trades, too few to measure.

Final thoughts on risk management

Treat this candlestick pattern as a good place to define risk, not as proof that the trend has turned, and compare it with other reversal patterns you trade. Put the stop beyond the doji, size the position on that distance, allow for overnight jumps, and keep the risk per trade small. Trading involves risk, and nothing here is investment advice.

About the author and the data. Written by Amaury, founder of PatternsWizard, who is passionate about finance, quantitative trading and data analysis. He built the PatternsWizard test bench, which detects each setup with fixed, published rules on full market history: crypto, forex, US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities. Trades and win rates are compared with random bars on the same assets, excess returns with the rest of the market, with error margins and a correction for multiple testing, and the whole pipeline is checked on random-walk prices, where nothing can be predicted. Statistics on this page were generated on November 5, 2026. The full methodology explains every step.

, Founder of PatternsWizard

Passionate about finance, quantitative trading and data analysis. Amaury built the PatternsWizard test bench, which detects each pattern on full price history and measures what happened next against random entries.

Statistics on this page come from our open methodology: every occurrence our rule finds on full history, compared with chance. How we test patterns.

179 patterns testedRandom-walk self-test passed