How we tested this pattern
- Sample
- 257 occurrences on 6 markets (crypto, forex, US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities), 1986 to 2026.
- Detection
- Found by code, never picked by hand: every match of the rule on full price history, winners and losers alike.After a downtrend: three long white candles, each opening inside the previous body, each closing higher, all with short upper shadows. A long body is at least 1.3 times the average body of the 10 candles before the pattern and at least 0.6 times the largest of them.
- Benchmark
- Each occurrence is compared with the same assets on random bars: the move 10 bars later, and a 2:1 reward-to-risk trade.
- Checks
- Block bootstrap and a correction for the thousands of tests we run, plus a random-walk self-test that the bench passes: on random prices, no pattern should win.
- Updated
- Data updated November 5, 2026, code version c2a1683f. Read the methodology · Raw data (JSON)
At a glance: what textbooks say, what we measured
- Direction
- Bullish
- Occurrences tested
- 257 occurrences, all markets, daily
- Textbook: price should rise after it
- Too close to call · −0.81% vs the market, 10 bars
- Where it did best, US stocks left out
- Crypto, 1-hour: +0.04 R 2:1 trade vs random dates, not proven
- Verdict
- 10-bar move: No clear edge2:1 trade: No clear edge
On this page
- What is the three white soldiers pattern?
- Anatomy and structure of the three white soldiers
- Market psychology behind the bullish march
- How to identify the pattern on a chart
- How to confirm the three white soldiers signal
- Real examples
- Trading strategies for the three white soldiers
- Mistakes to avoid when trading this pattern
- Comparing the three white soldiers to similar patterns
- Advantages and limitations of the pattern
- Reliability and success rate of the three white soldiers
- Case studies of the three white soldiers pattern
- Execution tips
- Frequently asked questions
- Summary of key points
The three white soldiers pattern is a bullish reversal pattern made of three consecutive long-bodied candlesticks after a downtrend: each one opens inside the real body of the previous session and closes higher, near its high. In classical candlestick analysis (Nison) it is read as a strong bullish signal and a shift in market sentiment: sellers lose control and buyers push price up three candles in a row.
This guide covers the definition, how to identify the three white soldiers pattern on a chart, how to trade it, and what actually happened after it. Our test bench applied a strict rule to full price history, detected 257 on daily charts across stocks, crypto, forex, ETFs, indices and commodities, and compared the outcome with random bars on the same assets.
What is the three white soldiers pattern?
The three white soldiers pattern is a three-candle bullish reversal pattern that appears at the end of a downtrend and suggests the start of an uptrend. The name comes from Japanese candlestick charting, where a "white" candlestick is a bullish one, closing above its open: three strong bullish sessions marching up in step, like soldiers. The three white soldiers pattern serves as a signal that the current downtrend may be over.
Steve Nison, who introduced Japanese candlestick charting to Western traders in Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991), calls the pattern three advancing white soldiers and warns about two weaker versions, the advance block and the stalled pattern, where the advance loses strength. We come back to them below.
Anatomy and structure of the three white soldiers
- Long white candleafter a downtrend
- Opens inside previous bodycloses higher
- Short upper shadow
- Closes higher againopens inside previous body
Defining the three bullish candles
The three white soldiers candlestick pattern consists of three bullish candles in a row, with five conditions:
- a downtrend before the first soldier;
- three white (green) candles, each with a close above its open;
- each candle has a long real body, bigger than those of recent candles;
- each candle opens inside the body of the previous one;
- each candle closes higher than the one before, near its top.
Our test bench uses the same rule, written so a computer can apply it without judgment: after a downtrend (the last close before the pattern is at least one average true range (ATR) below the close 10 bars earlier, and in the lower half of the 40 previous closes), three consecutive long-bodied candlesticks, each opening inside the previous body, each closing higher, all with short upper shadows. "Long" means a body more than 1.3 times the mean body of the 10 prior bars (1.6 times on a textbook pattern), stricter than in the open-source TA-Lib library: our rule finds only 16% of the cases TA-Lib flags. This strict rule is important: three green candles in a row, which appear far more often, are not enough.
Understanding candle body and wick requirements
The upper shadows (wicks) must be short: each candle closes near its top, a sign that buyers held their gains until the market closed. A big upper wick on the second or third soldier is the first sign of selling pressure and a potential warning. Classic descriptions give less weight to the lower shadows. The three real bodies should be similar in size or growing; a shrinking third body is the warning sign Nison describes.
The chart below is not drawn by hand. It is the typical (median) shape of the three white soldiers patterns our bench detected in daily data across all markets, with the lines of the trading setup we test: buy above the third soldier, stop-loss below the low of the first, target at twice the risk.
This is a large formation. On the median daily occurrence, the three candles together cover 6.91% of price, or 2.63 times the average true range (ATR) of the asset. That size has a direct consequence for the stop-loss, as we will see.
Market psychology behind the bullish march
Weakening of selling pressure
The formation starts after a decline, when sellers are in control. The first green candle is the first strong session for buyers. On its own, it could be a short-covering rally, a potential trap. The fact that each session opens inside the previous body, without a large gap, shows an orderly advance rather than a single spike.
Shift in buyer momentum and conviction
The second and third soldiers confirm the first: buyers return every day, with bullish candles that push price to a new high and close near it. Each higher close can squeeze traders who sold short during the decline. The pattern suggests a shift in momentum and market sentiment from sellers to buyers, and classical analysis reads it as a sign of a potential uptrend, with bullish momentum indicating that buyers are in control. That reading is plausible, but it describes three candles. Whether they predict the next weeks is a question for data, and we answer it in the reliability section.
How to identify the pattern on a chart
Identifying the three white soldiers pattern takes three steps, once the third soldier is complete.
Step 1: confirming the prior downtrend
Step 2: validating consecutive higher closes
Each of the three consecutive candles must close above the previous close, and each must have a large real body. Three small green bars do not count: strong bullish momentum is the key point of the three white soldiers pattern.
Step 3: analyzing the opening and closing ranges
Each session should open inside the body of the previous session, not far above it, and end at or close to its top, with a short upper shadow. Check the third soldier with care: a small body or a big upper wick shows buyers losing strength. After a rise rather than a decline, that weakening shape is a different pattern, the advance block or the stalled pattern, read as a bearish warning rather than a bullish signal.
How to confirm the three white soldiers signal
Before you enter, confirmation can come from volume, technical indicators and the location of the pattern on the chart. Here is what each one adds to the three white soldiers pattern, and what our statistical analysis says about two of them.
The decisive role of trading volume
A classic rule says volume should rise during the three white soldiers pattern, as a sign that buyers stepped in with size. We measured volume, and the result goes the other way. In daily data, signals with volume above 1.5 times the 20-day average volume were followed by a gain 10 days later 47.9% of the time and reached the 2:1 target 18.2% of the time; signals on normal volume did better, at 50.8% and 39.7%. This volume breakdown is descriptive (not corrected for multiple testing), so treat it with care, but it does not support high volume as a confirmation filter. Rising volume is a reasonable thing to look at; it is not a reason to enter. Low volume on the three soldiers is not a reason to skip the signal either, according to our data.
Aligning with RSI, moving averages and other indicators
Technical indicators such as the relative strength index (RSI) and moving averages can be used for confirmation. One rule is to avoid formations that end with the RSI deep in overbought territory. We have not tested an RSI filter or other momentum indicators such as the MACD; if you use these indicators, test them on your own market first. We did test the 200-day moving average: in our daily analysis, signals above it reached the 2:1 target 42.2% of the time (expectancy +0.41 R), against 24.5% (−0.13 R) below it. Both groups had a negative average excess return 10 days later, so the long-term trend filter did not turn the pattern into a bullish edge.
The importance of support and resistance zones
In classic analysis, a three white soldiers pattern that starts from a known support level, such as a prior low, has a clear reason to form there, and one that ends just under resistance can run into sellers right away. Check the chart for the next resistance levels first: it is where the advance may stall, and a natural place to consider taking profits. We have not tested where the pattern forms.
Real examples
Real occurrences from our test bench, each on its market's main timeframe. Crypto and US stock examples come from liquid assets only (the largest coins, the most traded stocks). Best and Worst are the best and worst 2:1 trade results, Textbook the cleanest shapes (chosen on geometry alone, never on the outcome), Most recent the latest detections among the assets the gallery draws from, Typical a random draw. Shaded area: the pattern. Dashed lines: entry, stop loss (SL) and 2:1 target (TP) of the tested trade. Dotted line: 10 bars after the signal. A result above +2 R or below −1 R means a bar opened past the target or the stop, and the trade was closed at that open. Stock and ETF prices are adjusted for splits and dividends, so they can differ from the prices quoted at the time. We left out 23 cards with a shape that does not read as the definition on this page. They still count in the statistics, and are not replaced: our bench picks a fixed number of cards per category.
Trading strategies for the three white soldiers
The classic trading strategy for the three white soldiers pattern buys a break above the high of the third soldier, with a stop-loss under the pattern and a target set as a multiple of the risk. This is the trade our bench simulates on every occurrence of the three white soldiers pattern.
- Entry
- Buy stop at the pattern high
- Stop loss (SL)
- At the pattern low
- Target (TP)
- Twice the risk (2:1)
A clean case from our bench: ETFsChosen on its shape alone, never on the outcome. ETF prices are adjusted for splits and dividends, so they can differ from the prices quoted at the time.
Defining your entry trigger
There are two ways to enter. The aggressive one buys at the close of the third soldier. The conservative one places a buy stop just above the high of the third soldier and waits for price to trade through it, a form of confirmation; it is the version we measured. In our daily tests, the buy stop was triggered 88.7% of the time; in the other 10.9% of cases, price fell below the low of the pattern first and the signal was canceled before any trade was opened. In the few remaining cases, the order was never filled: neither level was touched within the 20 bars the order stays active, or the data ended first.
Setting an intelligent stop-loss
The natural stop-loss is below the low of the first soldier: if price trades back below it, the whole advance has been erased and the pattern has failed. Because the three white soldiers pattern is large, that stop is wide: the median pattern spans more than twice the average true range. The risk on each trade is that distance from entry to stop: size the position on it, not on your conviction, so the risk stays the same from one trade to the next. A tighter stop below the second soldier is possible, but it is not the version we tested.
Establishing realistic profit targets
A typical target is twice the risk (a 2:1 reward-to-risk ratio). With a wide stop, that target is far away: in daily data, trades that reached it took a median of 25 days, and trades that were stopped took a median of 16 days. Plan for a trade that lasts weeks, not days, while the new trend develops, and decide your exit before entry. In our data, one winning trade in four needed 45 days or more, so plan for long holding periods. The next resistance level is a reasonable alternative exit point, and a trailing stop is another way to exit if the uptrend continues.
Mistakes to avoid when trading this pattern
Ignoring the broader market context
Falling for the pattern in a sideways trend
In a range, three strong green candles can take price from the bottom to the top of the range, right into resistance. Without a decline before it, the signal means little.
Overlooking overbought market conditions
Three long white candles move price a great deal in three sessions. The entry above the third soldier is then far from the stop, and short-term market participants may take profits. Our data shows a down session more often, without showing why: in daily data, the session right after the three white soldiers pattern closed up only 45.5% of the time, against 50.7% for random bars (a descriptive figure, not tested for significance and not shown in the statistics tables). Buying the close of the third soldier means buying after a large move.
Comparing the three white soldiers to similar patterns
- Three Black CrowsBearish10-bar move, daily No clear edge
- Engulfing CandleBullish or bearishBullish, 10-bar move, daily No clear edgeBearish, 10-bar move, daily No clear edge
- Morning StarBullish10-bar move, daily No clear edge
Three white soldiers vs. three black crows
The three black crows are the mirror image: three large black candles falling after an uptrend, a bearish reversal pattern. In daily trading data, 493 occurrences (448 closed trades) were followed by a decline 10 days later 43.9% of the time against 45.6% for random bars, and the 2:1 short setup had an expectancy of −0.22 R. Like the three white soldiers pattern, it showed no edge on daily charts that passes our statistical test.
Three white soldiers vs. bullish engulfing
The bullish engulfing pattern shows the same shift in one session: a white body that engulfs the previous black one, a two-candle signal. It is a far more frequent bullish signal, with 59,948 daily occurrences in our data against 257 for the three white soldiers. On 48,554 closed trades, its 2:1 setup reached the target 36.9% of the time against 35.7% on random dates, a result rated "No clear edge" on its page: the gap in hit rate shows up, but the average result per trade does not pass our statistical test.
Three white soldiers vs. morning star
The morning star is another three-candle bullish reversal pattern: a long black session, a small one, then a white one closing well into the first. Its 2:1 setup reached the target 40.6% of the time in daily data, against 34.2% on random dates, but its average result per trade does not pass our statistical test.
Advance block and stalled pattern
The advance block looks like three white soldiers with shrinking bodies or big upper shadows, and the stalled pattern ends with a short third soldier. Both appear after an uptrend and are read as bearish warnings. Both are far more frequent than the clean version: 2,212 advance blocks and 2,819 stalled formations in daily data.
Advantages and limitations of the pattern
Why this pattern is considered a strong reversal signal
- It is easy to spot: three bullish candles with rising closes and short upper shadows.
- It shows sustained buying and bullish sentiment over three sessions, not a single bar.
- It is rare: one occurrence every 32,989 daily bars in our data, so it stands out on a chart.
Weak results and thin markets
- On its own, this bullish signal showed no confirmed edge in any market. The highest raw numbers on daily charts, on indices (75.0% higher 10 days later against 58.2% for random bars), rest on 4 occurrences and are rated Not enough data: too few to interpret. On 4-hour charts, the 2:1 trade did better than random dates, crypto (+0.23 R against +0.10 R) and all markets together (+0.22 R against +0.06 R), but the gap does not pass our statistical test: rated no clear edge. Daily US stocks, the largest daily sample, read Weak, below chance on direction, a gap that passes a simple test but not our correction.
- The stop is wide, so the risk per share is high, and the holding period is long: a median of 25 days to reach a 2:1 target on daily data.
- In a thin market, three large bars on low volume can come from a few large orders. We have not measured liquidity, and daily crypto cannot tell us: our strict rule found only 16 occurrences there (13 closed trades), too few for our test to say anything.
Reliability and success rate of the three white soldiers
The three white soldiers pattern is not a reliable bullish signal on its own: on daily data it was followed by a gain less often than random bars on the same assets, with an average excess return that is not statistically significant. Here are the numbers from our technical analysis test bench, which applies the same strict rule to full price history and compares it with random bars on the same assets.
Moved the expected way 10 bars later, compared with random bars.
Measured on 257 daily three white soldiers occurrences across 236 assets. Random bars on the same assets are the honest baseline.
No clear edgeThree white soldiers against random bars on the same assets, by market, on daily candles. Bars of almost the same length mean no edge.
- All markets
- US stocks
- All markets
- US stocks
All statistics
Full results for the three white soldiers candlestick pattern, market by market
Every occurrence our rule finds on full price history, compared with what the same assets did on random bars. A pattern only earns an edge if it beats random entries after correcting for the thousands of tests we run.
Our verdict
Not a reliable signal on its own here. Use it as context, not as a trigger.
Three white soldiers: 257 occurrences tested
Bullish pattern · All markets · Daily · 236 assets · 1986-11 to 2026-10
What this means. No measurable difference from the rest of its market over the next 10 bars.
Timeline
- Entry triggered, after the pattern
- 1 day · middle half 1 to 1 · on 228 triggered entries
- Stop order beyond the pattern's extreme. 1 of these entries is not among the 227 trades: still open at the end of our data, or left out by the trade rules.
- Time to the 2:1 target, when hit
- 25 days · middle half 15 to 45 · on 78 trades that hit it
- Time to the stop, when hit
- 16 days · middle half 8 to 30 · on 128 trades that hit it
- Time in the trade, all exits
- 22 days · middle half 11 to 46 · on 227 trades
Size and trade path
- Pattern range, high to low
- 6.9% · middle half 4.5% to 11.1% · on 257 occurrences
- Range vs average bar (ATR)
- 2.63× · middle half 2.20× to 3.16× · on 257 occurrences
- Best open profit during the trade
- 0.99 R · middle half 0.36 R to 2.07 R · on 227 trades
- Stopped trades that were first up 1 R
- 14.8% · on 128 stopped trades
- Trades a stop moved to breakeven at +1 R would have closed flat instead of at a loss
- Entry order triggered
- 88.7% · on 257 occurrences
Medians, each on the cases named on its line; "middle half" spans the 25th to 75th percentile; no value under 30 cases.
How we detect it. After a downtrend: three long white candles, each opening inside the previous body, each closing higher, all with short upper shadows. A long body is at least 1.3 times the average body of the 10 candles before the pattern and at least 0.6 times the largest of them. Candlestick counts are not checked against planted examples, so they may not be exhaustive.
All measurements (19 rows)
10-bar move: did price go the expected way?
| Market | Occurrences | Pattern | Random bars | Excess | 10-bar move verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto · 1-hour | 543 | 45.5% | 48.2% | −0.02% | No clear edge |
| Forex · 1-hour | 142 | 54.9% | 50.3% | +0.003% | No clear edge |
| All markets · 1-hour | 685 | 47.4% | 48.7% | −0.02% | No clear edge |
| Crypto · 4-hour | 93 | 44.1% | 47.2% | +0.46% | No clear edge |
| Forex · 4-hour | 45 | 66.7% | 50.7% | +0.16% | No clear edge |
| All markets · 4-hour | 138 | 51.4% | 48.3% | +0.37% | No clear edge |
| Crypto · Daily | 16 | 25.0% | 43.0% | +0.43% | Not enough data |
| US stocks · Daily | 215 | 50.2% | 54.2% | −0.93% | Weak, below chance |
| ETFs · Daily | 10 | 80.0% | 58.2% | −0.27% | Not enough data |
| Indices · Daily | 4 | 75.0% | 58.2% | +1.75% | Not enough data |
| Forex · Daily | 8 | 37.5% | 50.8% | −0.37% | Not enough data |
| Commodities · Daily | 4 | 50.0% | 50.5% | −4.41% | Not enough data |
| All markets · Daily | 257 | 49.8% | 53.5% | −0.81% | No clear edge |
| Crypto · Weekly | 1 | 100.0% | 43.2% | −16.79% | Not enough data |
| US stocks · Weekly | 47 | 50.0% | 57.3% | −1.07% | No clear edge |
| ETFs · Weekly | 3 | 100.0% | 63.2% | +6.52% | Not enough data |
| Forex · Weekly | 1 | 0.0% | 43.5% | −5.37% | Not enough data |
| Commodities · Weekly | 2 | 100.0% | 50.3% | +5.91% | Not enough data |
| All markets · Weekly | 54 | 54.7% | 56.8% | −0.75% | No clear edge |
2:1 trade: target hit and average result
| Market | Trades | Target hit | Same trade, random dates | Per trade | 2:1 trade verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto · 1-hour | 522 | 31.8% | 31.0% | +0.10 R vs +0.06 R | No clear edge |
| Forex · 1-hour | 135 | 25.9% | 25.6% | +0.04 R vs +0.01 R | No clear edge |
| All markets · 1-hour | 657 | 30.6% | 29.9% | +0.09 R vs +0.05 R | No clear edge |
| Crypto · 4-hour | 87 | 37.9% | 33.6% | +0.23 R vs +0.10 R | No clear edge |
| Forex · 4-hour | 44 | 34.1% | 25.6% | +0.19 R vs −0.01 R | No clear edge |
| All markets · 4-hour | 131 | 36.6% | 30.9% | +0.22 R vs +0.06 R | No clear edge |
| Crypto · Daily | 13 | 7.7% | 28.8% | −0.77 R vs −0.03 R | Not enough data |
| US stocks · Daily | 190 | 36.3% | 33.9% | +0.24 R vs +0.13 R | No clear edge |
| ETFs · Daily | 9 | 55.6% | 28.7% | +0.67 R vs −0.06 R | Not enough data |
| Indices · Daily | 4 | 75.0% | 58.3% | +1.25 R vs +0.76 R | Not enough data |
| Forex · Daily | 7 | 0.0% | 19.0% | −1.00 R vs −0.40 R | Not enough data |
| Commodities · Daily | 4 | 0.0% | 33.3% | −0.48 R vs 0.00 R | Not enough data |
| All markets · Daily | 227 | 34.4% | 33.3% | +0.17 R vs +0.10 R | No clear edge |
| Crypto · Weekly | 1 | 0.0% | 0.0% | −1.00 R vs −1.00 R | Not enough data |
| US stocks · Weekly | 42 | 47.6% | 44.1% | +0.61 R vs +0.43 R | No clear edge |
| ETFs · Weekly | 2 | 100.0% | 33.3% | +2.00 R vs +0.37 R | Not enough data |
| Forex · Weekly | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a vs n/a | Not enough data |
| Commodities · Weekly | 2 | 50.0% | 16.7% | +0.50 R vs +0.05 R | Not enough data |
| All markets · Weekly | 47 | 48.9% | 41.5% | +0.63 R vs +0.38 R | No clear edge |
Data updated November 5, 2026 · code version c2a1683f · Read the methodology. We measure every pattern on crypto and forex (1-hour, 4-hour, daily and weekly charts) and US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities (daily and weekly charts). A market or timeframe from that list missing from the tables above had no occurrence.
What you often read
“The three white soldiers candlestick pattern is a reliable bullish reversal signal.”
What our data shows
On 257 daily occurrences, it moved in the expected direction 49.8% of the time, against 53.5% for random bars: no clear edge, since the average excess return is not statistically significant.
Table quoted in the text (verdicts and every market: see All measurements)
| Market and timeframe | Patterns tested | Higher 10 bars later | Random bars | Closed trades | 2:1 target hit | Same setup, random dates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All markets, daily | 257 | 49.8% | 53.5% | 227 | 34.4% | 33.3% |
| US stocks, daily | 215 | 50.2% | 54.2% | 190 | 36.3% | 33.9% |
| Crypto, hourly | 543 | 45.5% | 48.2% | 522 | 31.8% | 31.0% |
| Crypto, 4-hour | 93 | 44.1% | 47.2% | 87 | 37.9% | 33.6% |
| Forex, hourly | 142 | 54.9% | 50.3% | 135 | 25.9% | 25.6% |
| Forex, 4-hour | 45 | 66.7% | 50.7% | 44 | 34.1% | 25.6% |
| All markets, weekly | 54 | 54.7% | 56.8% | 47 | 48.9% | 41.5% |
Read the table in pairs of columns. On daily charts, 49.8% of three white soldiers signals were followed by a gain 10 days later. That sounds mildly bullish until you see that 53.5% of random bars on the same assets were too: the average stock rises more often than it falls. The excess return over the rest of the market after 10 days is −0.81%, with a 95% confidence interval from −1.66% to −0.12%. On US stocks alone the gap is −0.93% (interval −1.73% to −0.18%): the pattern was followed by slightly weaker returns than random days, a gap that passes a simple test but not our correction for multiple testing (weak, below chance). Over all markets, the interval only just excludes zero, but the test itself does not count the gap as significant, and it is far from surviving our correction for multiple testing.
The 2:1 trading setup suggests a better picture at first sight: on daily data its expectancy was +0.17 R per trade before trading costs. But the same entry, stop and target on random dates averaged +0.10 R. The positive number comes from the long holding period in a rising market, not from the pattern. In 4-hour crypto data the gap is larger (37.9% of targets hit against 33.6%, or +0.23 R against +0.10 R per trade), but on 87 trades it does not pass our statistical test, so we do not count it as an edge.
Is the three white soldiers reliable for day trading?
Not on its own. In hourly crypto data (543 occurrences on 301 coins), the pattern was followed by a gain 10 bars later 45.5% of the time against 48.2% for random bars. The next bar was up only 40.5% of the time against 47.9% (a descriptive figure, not tested for significance): the market more often pulled back right after the pattern. In hourly forex trading, 54.9% against 50.3%.
Stability over time
On daily data, the excess return after 10 days was −0.84% in the first half of the history and −0.78% in the second. The three white soldiers pattern did not become more useful as the market changed.
The method is published in our methodology.
Case studies of the three white soldiers pattern
The gallery in the "Real examples" section shows real three white soldiers picked by our bench, with their actual outcome. The four cases described here come from daily charts: one on crypto, the others on US stocks and ETFs. None reached its target; four cases are far too few for a test, so they illustrate the rules, not a result.
Example: a rise that fell short
From March 16 to 18, 2022, the ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) printed three white soldiers. The buy stop above the third soldier (65.42) was triggered on March 21, with a stop under 55.25, the low of the first soldier, and a 2:1 target at 85.77. Price climbed to 71.41 on March 29, short of the target, and ARKK was 2.7% higher 10 sessions after the pattern. It then fell back and hit the stop on April 21, 22 sessions after entry.
Example: a canceled setup
From October 24 to 26, 2025, COOKIE/USDT printed the pattern with a high at 0.1051 and a low at 0.0824. Price never traded above the high: it fell under the low of the first soldier on October 30, and the setup was canceled before any trade was opened. COOKIE was 34.5% lower 10 days after the pattern. This is what the cancel rule is for.
Example: failed setups
From October 4 to 6, 2023, Robinhood (HOOD) printed three white soldiers peaking at 9.99. The entry was triggered on October 10 with a stop at 9.43. HOOD rose only to 10.19, well short of the 11.11 target, then fell back and hit the stop on October 12: a full 1 R loss, and the stock was 8.1% lower 10 sessions after the pattern. From October 27 to 31, 2011, Boston Scientific (BSX) printed the pattern peaking at 5.93. The stock first dipped, so the entry was only triggered on November 9, and it was stopped on November 17.
Execution tips
Using the pattern across different trading timeframes
The three white soldiers pattern is rare on every timeframe: one occurrence every 32,989 daily bars, every 24,600 hourly bars and every 28,248 weekly bars in our data. On a watchlist of 50 stocks, expect fewer than one a year on the daily chart, so it cannot be a complete trading plan alone. Weekly occurrences had the best raw results (48.9% of 2:1 targets hit), but random weeks on the same assets came close (41.5%), and the gap in average result per trade (+0.63 R against +0.38 R) is not statistically significant.
Practicing with free market tools
Charting platforms such as TradingView can flag candlestick patterns, and the open-source TA-Lib library provides a CDL3WHITESOLDIERS function. Consider which definition your tool uses: thresholds for "long body" and "short shadow" differ. Before trading with real money in your trading account, open a free demo account, mark the last occurrences on your market, write down the entry, stop and target, and record the outcome. Compare it with the same setup on random days: that is the test we run at scale on every signal.
The role of risk management in your strategy
Whatever your trading strategy, the same points matter, with or without the three white soldiers pattern:
- a stop defined before entry, at the point where the pattern is proved wrong, with exit points decided in advance;
- a position size that risks a small, fixed share of your account, in line with your risk tolerance;
- a trading journal with every trade, so you can compare your trading results with chance;
- the same rules applied on every chart, without picking only the setups that look good afterwards.
Our data shows why the last point matters: of the daily trades that hit their stop, 14.8% had first been up 1 R. Looking back at a chart, the signals that worked are easy to see, and the ones that failed can be easy to forget. This page is trading education, not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Is the three white soldiers a reversal or continuation pattern?
By definition it is a bullish reversal pattern: it must follow a downtrend. Three similar bars in an uptrend show strength, but they are a continuation, not the three white soldiers. Our statistics only count the version after a downtrend.
What is the best timeframe to use with this pattern?
No timeframe was the best once compared with chance. Weekly occurrences reached the 2:1 target 48.9% of the time, but random weeks did 41.5%, and the gap in average result per trade is not significant on 54 occurrences (47 closed trades).
Can this pattern be used in the crypto and forex market?
Yes, the definition is the same on any asset and in any trading market. The results were not better there: in hourly crypto data, the pattern was followed by a gain less often than random bars, in hourly forex data more often, and in both cases the average excess return is not statistically significant. On 4-hour crypto bars, the average result per trade (+0.23 R against +0.10 R) did not pass our statistical test; nor did it on 4-hour forex (+0.19 R against −0.01 R on 44 trades).
What is the opposite of three white soldiers?
The three black crows: three long black candles falling after an uptrend, its bearish counterpart.
Is the three white soldiers pattern profitable?
Not on its own in our tests. On daily data, the 2:1 setup averaged +0.17 R per trade before costs, against +0.10 R for the same setup on random dates.
Summary of key points
- The three white soldiers pattern is three large white candles, each opening inside the previous body and closing higher, after a downtrend.
- It is rare: 257 occurrences on daily data across 236 assets.
- On daily data, 49.8% were followed by a gain 10 days later, against 53.5% for random bars on the same assets.
- The 2:1 setup reached its target 34.4% of the time, against 33.3% for the same setup on random dates.
- The stop is wide and the holding period long: plan the position size and the risk before entry.
If you trade the three white soldiers pattern, treat it as a location for a trade, not as a reason for one. Define the stop below the pattern before entry, so the risk is known, size the position on that distance, and keep the risk per trade small. The edge, if any, has to come from what you combine it with.
About the author and the data. Written by Amaury, founder of PatternsWizard, who is passionate about finance, quantitative trading and data analysis. He built the PatternsWizard test bench, which detects each setup with fixed, published rules on full market history: crypto, forex, US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities. Trades and win rates are compared with random bars on the same assets, excess returns with the rest of the market, with error margins and a correction for multiple testing, and the whole pipeline is checked on random-walk prices, where nothing can be predicted. Statistics on this page were generated on November 5, 2026. The full methodology explains every step.
