CandlestickBullish

Matching Low Candlestick Pattern: Rules, Trading and Tested Results

What is the matching low candlestick pattern? How to recognize its two candles, how to trade the break of the high, and which rows of our test stood out against random dates.

· Founder of PatternsWizard
Updated Statistics updated 12 min read
Matching low pattern

How we tested this pattern

Sample
1,844 occurrences on 6 markets (crypto, forex, US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities), 1982 to 2026.
Detection
Found by code, never picked by hand: every match of the rule on full price history, winners and losers alike.After a downtrend: two black candles closing at the same price, the first one long. A long body is at least 1.3 times the average body of the 10 candles before the pattern and at least 0.6 times the largest of them.
Benchmark
Each occurrence is compared with the same assets on random bars: the move 10 bars later, and a 2:1 reward-to-risk trade.
Checks
Block bootstrap and a correction for the thousands of tests we run, plus a random-walk self-test that the bench passes: on random prices, no pattern should win.
Updated
Data updated November 5, 2026, code version c2a1683f. Read the methodology · Raw data (JSON)

Every pattern's results on one sheet

The only pattern cheat sheet with tested stats: 152 patterns, what the textbook says and what really happened on 6 markets. Free PDF, sent to your inbox.

One email with the PDF, then a note when a result changes. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.

At a glance: what textbooks say, what we measured
Direction
Bullish
Occurrences tested
1,844 occurrences, all markets, daily
Textbook: price should rise after it
Too close to call · +0.04% vs the market, 10 bars
Its best market and timeframe, still negative, US stocks left out
Crypto, 1-hour: −0.08 R 2:1 trade vs random dates, not proven
Verdict
10-bar move: No clear edge2:1 trade: No clear edge

See the statistics

On this page
  1. What is the matching low candlestick pattern?
  2. How to identify the matching low on a chart
  3. Psychology behind the matching low pattern
  4. Real examples
  5. Step-by-step trading strategy for the matching low pattern
  6. Matching low vs. tweezer bottom: key differences
  7. The importance of volume and market context in trading
  8. Combining with technical indicators
  9. Common mistakes to avoid when trading this candlestick pattern
  10. Limitations of the matching low pattern
  11. Backtesting the pattern: our trading results
  12. Matching low pattern examples
  13. Where the pattern fits in technical analysis
  14. Frequently asked questions
  15. Summary

The matching low candlestick pattern is a two-candle bullish reversal pattern that forms in a downtrend: a long bearish candle, then a second bearish candle that closes at the same price. The two identical closing levels suggest that sellers hit a floor and that a support level may be forming.

This guide explains how to identify this two-candle formation, the psychology behind it, how to use it in trading, and what happened after this pattern in real market history. We applied the same rule to full price history and found 1,844 occurrences of this candlestick pattern on daily charts and 738 on hourly crypto charts across stocks, crypto, forex, ETFs, indices and commodities, and compared the outcome with random bars on the same assets. Our test results are based on that comparison.

What is the matching low candlestick pattern?

The matching low is a bullish reversal candlestick pattern that consists of two bearish candlestick bars with the same closing price (or nearly the same, within a small fraction of the recent average range) at the end of a fall in prices. The pattern forms at the bottom of the move, where prices have already dropped for several bars. In Japanese candlestick analysis, two candles that close at the same low point mark a short-term support: the market went down twice to the same price and could not close below it.

The first candle: sustained bearish momentum

The first candlestick is a long bearish candle that opens near its high and closes near its low, in line with the downtrend. Selling pressure looks intact.

The second candle: support and price stabilization

The second candlestick, smaller in the textbook picture, closes at the same low level as the first. It can open near the first close and trade below the previous low during the session, but the close comes back to the matching price. That repeated low is the whole point of the candlestick pattern, and the reason for its name.

The chart below is not drawn by hand. It is the median shape of a sample of the occurrences our bench detected on daily charts across all markets (the caption gives the count), with faded bars showing the fall before the pattern, and the lines of the position we test: entry above the high, stop loss below the low, target at twice the risk.

TPSLEntryBullish
Bullish setup on the median shape of 1,820 daily occurrences from all markets, with entry, stop loss (SL) and 2:1 target (TP)

How to identify the matching low on a chart

To identify it on candlestick charts, look for four points, in this order:

  • Downtrend: the market is falling (the last close before the pattern is at least one average true range below the close 10 bars earlier, in the lower half of the last 40 closes).
  • First candle: a long bearish candle (black or red).
  • Second candle: also black; our rule sets no limit on its size.
  • Matching closes: both candles close at the same low level, or within a tiny gap of each other.
123
  1. Long black candleafter a downtrend
  2. Second black candle
  3. Same closing priceas the first candle
Median shape of all 1,820 usable daily occurrences from all markets, found by our test bench.

Our test bench applies this rule without judgment: two black candlesticks closing at the same price, as in the CDLMATCHINGLOW function of the open-source TA-Lib library, plus two conditions of our own: a prior downtrend and a first body that is long compared with the 10 prior bars. On geometry alone, with TA-Lib's own threshold for a long body, it finds about 40% of the cases that function flags on the bars we compared. A stricter variant asks for no lower shadow on either candle; our rule, like TA-Lib, does not require it.

Psychology behind the matching low pattern

On the first candle, sellers dominate and price closes near the low. On the next, price opens near that close, sellers push it down again, but the close stops at the same low point as the day before. They could not make a lower close: the first sign that selling pressure is fading and that buyers defend that level. Classical candlestick analysis reads it as a potential trend reversal, indicating that the previous decline may be ending. Seen from the sellers' side, it indicates exhaustion; from the buyers' side, a potential entry point.

The reading is plausible, but neither candle is bullish. Nothing in this candlestick pattern shows buyers in control yet, which is why it makes sense to wait for a confirmation candle before trading it.

Real examples

Real occurrences from our test bench, each on its market's main timeframe. Category cards on US stocks come from liquid assets only (the most traded stocks). Best and Worst are the best and worst 2:1 trade results, Textbook the cleanest shapes (chosen on geometry alone, never on the outcome), Most recent the latest detections among the assets the gallery draws from, Typical a random draw. Matching low pattern: on forex, our bench gives a single example card, so it carries no Best, Worst or other label: it is one real occurrence, not a ranked pick. Shaded area: the pattern. Dashed lines: entry, stop loss (SL) and 2:1 target (TP) of the tested trade. Dotted line: 10 bars after the signal. A result above +2 R or below −1 R means a bar opened past the target or the stop, and the trade was closed at that open. Stock and ETF prices are adjusted for splits and dividends, so they can differ from the prices quoted at the time. We left out 17 cards: 16 with a shape that does not read as the definition on this page, 1 with an overnight jump that may be a switch between two futures contracts. They still count in the statistics, and are not replaced: our bench picks a fixed number of cards per category.

Market
Examples
US stocks overallAcross 1,745 daily matching low occurrences, price moved the expected way 10 bars later 52.6% of the time, against 54.1% for random bars. The average excess return does not pass our significance test.No clear edgeThe examples below are single cases.
◂ Pattern41.9428.84+10 barsTPSLEntry2022-09
Best tradeLRCX October 17, 2022Daily chart28.3% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.00 R
◂ Pattern562.5344.8+10 barsTPSLEntry2026-01
Best tradeINTU February 24, 2026Daily chart26.6% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.00 R
◂ Pattern349.4205.2+10 barsTPSLEntry2021-12
Worst tradeMETA January 27, 2022Daily chart22.6% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −3.77 R
◂ Pattern41.4626.79+10 barsTPSLEntry2011-07
TextbookCRM August 5, 2011Daily chart18.2% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry
◂ Pattern341.8203.6TPSLEntry2026-092026-10
Most recentCOHR October 19, 2026Daily chart2:1 trade: invalidated before entry
◂ Pattern347.8277.2+10 barsTPSLEntry2026-08
Most recentHD September 17, 2026Daily chart6.6% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry
◂ Pattern30.3226.01+10 barsTPSLEntry2023-07
TypicalBAC August 17, 2023Daily chart1.3% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry
Examples
ETFs overallAcross 60 daily matching low occurrences, price moved the expected way 10 bars later 61.7% of the time, against 56.3% for random bars. The average excess return does not pass our significance test.No clear edgeThe examples below are single cases.
◂ Pattern105.4597.56+10 barsTPSLEntry2015-06
Best tradeQQQ July 9, 2015Daily chart5.8% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.16 R
◂ Pattern71.5070.24+10 barsTPSLEntry2022-08
Worst tradeSHY September 27, 2022Daily chart0.1% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.31 R
◂ Pattern41.9939.77+10 barsTPSLEntry2012-04
Worst tradeHYG May 18, 2012Daily chart0.6% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.17 R
◂ Pattern98.3076.40+10 barsTPSLEntry2016-06
TextbookUSO July 8, 2016Daily chart3.8% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry
◂ Pattern86.9080.15+10 barsTPSLEntry2026-08
Most recentXLP September 10, 2026Daily chart1.0% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R
◂ Pattern89.5077.20+10 barsTPSLEntry2015-12
TypicalVTI January 11, 2016Daily chart1.3% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry
◂ Pattern28.1625.26+10 barsTPSLEntry2016-04
TypicalEEM May 5, 2016Daily chart2.7% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry
◂ Pattern66.4964.55+10 barsTPSLEntry2021-11
TypicalHYG December 1, 2021Daily chart1.7% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.00 R
Examples
Indices overallAcross 23 daily matching low occurrences, too few cases to give a percentage (we need at least 30).Not enough dataThe examples below are single cases.
◂ Pattern1,8801,641+10 barsTPSLEntry1992-07
Best tradeCAC 40 August 26, 1992Daily chart5.3% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.75 R
◂ Pattern1,7231,543+10 barsTPSLEntry2009-09
Worst tradeKOSPI October 7, 2009Daily chart3.5% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.17 R
◂ Pattern2,5992,364+10 barsTPSLEntry1983-12
TextbookS&P/TSX Composite January 26, 1984Daily chart4.9% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry
◂ Pattern2,4802,244+10 barsTPSLEntry2018-05
TextbookKOSPI July 3, 2018Daily chart1.1% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry
◂ Pattern7,9417,505+10 barsTPSLEntry2025-05
Most recentTypicalCAC 40 June 26, 2025Daily chart4.6% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.00 R
◂ Pattern3,5063,136+10 barsTPSLEntry1990-08
TypicalS&P/TSX Composite September 12, 1990Daily chart2.8% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry
Examples
Commodities overallAcross 15 daily matching low occurrences, too few cases to give a percentage (we need at least 30).Not enough dataThe examples below are single cases.
◂ Pattern63.7149.96+10 barsTPSLEntry2018-11
Best tradeBrent crude oil futures December 28, 2018Daily chart13.0% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: target hit, +2.00 R
◂ Pattern29.1620.03+10 barsTPSLEntry2023-11
TextbookMost recentSugar futures December 7, 2023Daily chart12.1% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry
◂ Pattern3.722.54+10 barsTPSLEntry2019-01
TypicalNatural gas futures February 14, 2019Daily chart11.1% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry

Real occurrences The only occurrence on forex (daily charts)

Forex overallAcross 1 daily matching low occurrence, too few cases to give a percentage (we need at least 30).Not enough dataThe example below is a single case.
◂ Pattern0.83370.8242+10 barsTPSLEntry2014-01
NZD/USD February 3, 2014Daily chart3.6% in the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: stopped out, −1.00 R

Step-by-step trading strategy for the matching low pattern

Entry criteria and signal validation

The classic entry is a buy stop just above the high of the pattern, or a bullish confirmation candle that closes above it. In our tests the buy stop was triggered in only 28.0% of daily cases; in 71.7%, the market broke the pattern low first and the setup was canceled, and the few remaining setups expired, with neither level reached within 20 bars or before the end of the data. Waiting for the market to confirm filters out most signals: a confirmation candle is required before trading this candlestick pattern, and waiting means missing some moves.

Setting stop-loss and take-profit levels

  • Stop loss: just below the lowest low of the two candlesticks. Below it, the support has failed.
  • Take-profit: twice the risk (2:1), or the next resistance level, a target our bench does not test.
  • Position size: computed from the distance between entry and stop, with a small share of the account at risk.
TPSLEntryBullish
Entry
Buy stop at the pattern high
Stop loss (SL)
At the pattern low
Target (TP)
Twice the risk (2:1)
The trade our bench tests, drawn on the typical shape. Median shape of all 1,820 usable daily occurrences from all markets.

A clean case from our bench: US stocksChosen on its shape alone, never on the outcome. Stock prices are adjusted for splits and dividends, so they can differ from the prices quoted at the time.

◂ Pattern41.4626.79+10 barsTPSLEntry2011-07
TextbookCRM August 5, 2011Daily chart18.2% against the expected direction after 10 bars2:1 trade: invalidated before entry

On the daily timeframe, positions that reached the 2:1 target took a median of 10 days; stopped positions took a median of 5 days. Of the positions that hit their stop, 24.4% had first been up 1 R.

Matching low vs. tweezer bottom: key differences

A tweezer bottom is a candlestick pattern made of two bars with the same low (the bottom of the shadows), in its classic form a bearish candle followed by a bullish one. The matching low pattern uses the same closing price, and both candles are bearish. The tweezer bottom already shows buyers on the second candle; this pattern only shows sellers failing to push the close down.

This candlestick pattern is also close to the homing pigeon, where the last black body sits inside the first, and to the double bottom, the chart pattern version: two lows at the same price over weeks instead of two days.

The importance of volume and market context in trading

Combining with technical indicators

Combining the pattern with indicators and levels makes sure the candlestick pattern is not the only reason for the trade. Three technical tools can help here: support levels, trend filters and momentum indicators.

Using support and resistance levels

Mark support and resistance on the chart before the pattern forms. It is important to know where the previous support level was: classic analysis treats a matching low on that level as a stronger setup than one in empty space, a filter our bench has not tested. The setup it prefers is a pattern that forms on support, with room up to the next resistance of at least twice the distance to the stop.

Integrating RSI or moving averages

We tested the 200-day moving average as a trend filter: on daily charts, setups above it reached the 2:1 target 39.6% of the time, against 35.7% below it, with an expectancy of +0.19 R above and +0.09 R below. The gap is small, and this breakdown is descriptive, not corrected for multiple tests. We have not tested an RSI filter, so we cannot say whether an oversold reading, suggesting a stretched decline, helps.

Common mistakes to avoid when trading this candlestick pattern

  • Buying at the open of the next day, before any confirmation from the market.
  • Trading options or leverage on the pattern alone, with no stop.
  • Calling any two equal closes a matching low, even without a strong downtrend.
  • Placing the stop inside the range of the pattern.
  • Ignoring the larger trend: in a strong bear market, the pattern can be only a pause before the next leg down. If the low breaks, cancel the setup.

Limitations of the matching low pattern

Why it should not be used as a standalone indicator

On its own, this candlestick pattern showed no proven edge over chance on any market or timeframe we tested, as the next section shows; no row with enough patterns passes even a simple test on the 10-bar move: hourly crypto comes closest, with a small gain that turns negative after costs, and daily indices show a larger move on too few patterns to read. Use it to start looking for a position, not as a reason for one, and confirm the direction with other signals. Like other candlestick patterns, it needs context: in a falling market, the same two candles can mark a pause before the next leg down.

The necessity of confirmation candles

Two falling candles are not a reversal, and a confirmation is not optional. The break above the high is what turns this candlestick pattern into a position, and most setups never get there.

Backtesting the pattern: our trading results

Here are the numbers from our test bench, which applied the same rule to full price history and compared the outcome with random bars on the same assets.

53.3%vs 54.2% at random

Moved the expected way 10 bars later, compared with random bars.

Measured on 1,844 daily matching low occurrences across 980 assets. Random bars on the same assets are the honest baseline.

No clear edge

Matching low against random bars on the same assets, by market, on daily candles. Bars of almost the same length mean no edge.

Moved the expected way 10 bars laterMatching lowRandom bars
  • All markets
    All markets, Matching low: 53.3%
    All markets, Random bars: 54.2%
  • US stocks
    US stocks, Matching low: 52.6%
    US stocks, Random bars: 54.1%
  • ETFs
    ETFs, Matching low: 61.7%
    ETFs, Random bars: 56.3%
2:1 trade hit its targetMatching low tradeSame trade, random dates
  • All markets
    All markets, Matching low trade: 36.9%
    All markets, Same trade, random dates: 32.6%
  • US stocks
    US stocks, Matching low trade: 35.6%
    US stocks, Same trade, random dates: 30.3%
All statistics

Full results for the matching low candlestick pattern, market by market

Every occurrence our rule finds on full price history, compared with what the same assets did on random bars. A pattern only earns an edge if it beats random entries after correcting for the thousands of tests we run.

Our verdict

Not a reliable signal on its own here. Use it as context, not as a trigger.

10-bar move No clear edge2:1 trade No clear edge

Matching low: 1,844 occurrences tested

Bullish pattern · All markets · Daily · 980 assets · 1982-02 to 2026-10

Moved the expected way after 10 bars
53.3%
vs 54.2% on random bars
Excess return vs its market, 10 bars
+0.04%
95% interval −0.38% to +0.42%
its market−3%+3%
2:1 trade hit the target
36.9%
vs 32.6% for the same trade on random dates
Average result per trade
+0.12 R
vs −0.02 R on random dates

What this means. No measurable difference from the rest of its market over the next 10 bars.

Timeline

Entry triggered, after the pattern
2 days · middle half 1 to 3 · on 516 triggered entries
Stop order beyond the pattern's extreme. 1 of these entries is not among the 515 trades: still open at the end of our data, or left out by the trade rules.
Time to the 2:1 target, when hit
10 days · middle half 6 to 21 · on 190 trades that hit it
Time to the stop, when hit
5 days · middle half 2 to 11 · on 316 trades that hit it
Time in the trade, all exits
7 days · middle half 3 to 15 · on 515 trades

Size and trade path

Pattern range, high to low
4.0% · middle half 2.8% to 6.0% · on 1,844 occurrences
Range vs average bar (ATR)
1.40× · middle half 1.17× to 1.69× · on 1,844 occurrences
Best open profit during the trade
1.22 R · middle half 0.38 R to 2.09 R · on 515 trades
Stopped trades that were first up 1 R
24.4% · on 316 stopped trades
Trades a stop moved to breakeven at +1 R would have closed flat instead of at a loss
Entry order triggered
28.0% · on 1,844 occurrences

Medians, each on the cases named on its line; "middle half" spans the 25th to 75th percentile; no value under 30 cases.

How we detect it. After a downtrend: two black candles closing at the same price, the first one long. A long body is at least 1.3 times the average body of the 10 candles before the pattern and at least 0.6 times the largest of them. Candlestick counts are not checked against planted examples, so they may not be exhaustive.

All measurements (13 rows)

10-bar move: did price go the expected way?

Figures in gray: fewer than 30 occurrences, not interpreted. Excess return is signed so that positive favors the pattern. The test uses the bootstrap’s standard error and the interval its percentiles: near the 0.05 line, or on a few extreme moves, an interval can leave out zero while the test does not pass, and the test decides. Stock data misses most delisted companies, a survivorship bias we have not sized, which can flatter stock rows.
MarketOccurrencesPatternRandom barsExcess10-bar move verdict
Crypto · 1-hour73850.1%45.0%+0.18%No clear edge
Crypto · 4-hour4250.0%42.5%−0.14%No clear edge
US stocks · Daily1,74552.6%54.1%−0.02%No clear edge
ETFs · Daily6061.7%56.3%−0.06%No clear edge
Indices · Daily2378.3%57.1%+1.82%Not enough data
Forex · Daily1100.0%49.1%+2.42%Not enough data
Commodities · Daily1553.3%50.7%+4.30%Not enough data
All markets · Daily1,84453.3%54.2%+0.04%No clear edge
US stocks · Weekly4572.7%55.6%+0.75%No clear edge
ETFs · Weekly250.0%61.0%+2.97%Not enough data
Indices · Weekly250.0%58.9%−1.33%Not enough data
Forex · Weekly1n/an/an/aNot enough data
All markets · Weekly5070.8%56.0%+0.75%No clear edge

2:1 trade: target hit and average result

R = initial risk of the trade. Entry by an order at the trigger level, filled at the open when a bar opens beyond it. Exit at the stop or the target, or at the open when a bar opens beyond either one; otherwise at the close after 100 bars. When one bar touches both the stop and the target, the loss is counted. No fees or slippage. n/a = not measured. Per trade: average result, against the same trade on random dates. Figures in gray: fewer than 30 closed trades, not interpreted.
MarketTradesTarget hitSame trade, random datesPer trade2:1 trade verdict
Crypto · 1-hour26314.4%19.7%−0.56 R vs −0.40 RNo clear edge
Crypto · 4-hour185.6%19.2%−0.83 R vs −0.42 RNot enough data
US stocks · Daily47735.6%30.3%+0.08 R vs −0.09 RNo clear edge
ETFs · Daily2254.5%51.7%+0.64 R vs +0.55 RNot enough data
Indices · Daily1154.5%60.0%+0.76 R vs +0.85 RNot enough data
Forex · Daily10.0%100.0%−1.00 R vs +2.00 RNot enough data
Commodities · Daily450.0%66.7%+0.75 R vs +1.00 RNot enough data
All markets · Daily51536.9%32.6%+0.12 R vs −0.02 RNo clear edge
US stocks · Weekly742.9%22.2%+0.29 R vs −0.34 RNot enough data
ETFs · Weekly0n/an/an/a vs n/aNot enough data
Indices · Weekly0n/an/an/a vs n/aNot enough data
Forex · Weekly0n/an/an/a vs n/aNot enough data
All markets · Weekly742.9%22.2%+0.29 R vs −0.34 RNot enough data

Data updated November 5, 2026 · code version c2a1683f · Read the methodology. We measure every pattern on crypto and forex (1-hour, 4-hour, daily and weekly charts) and US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities (daily and weekly charts). A market or timeframe from that list missing from the tables above had no occurrence.

What you often read

“The matching low candlestick pattern is a reliable bullish reversal signal.”

What our data shows

On 1,844 daily occurrences, it moved in the expected direction 53.3% of the time, against 54.2% for random bars: no clear edge, since the average excess return is not statistically significant.

Table quoted in the text (verdicts and every market: see All measurements)
Market and timeframePatterns testedHigher 10 bars laterRandom barsClosed trades2:1 target hitRandom datesExpectancy (R)
All markets, daily1,84453.3%54.2%51536.9%32.6%+0.12
US stocks, daily1,74552.6%54.1%47735.6%30.3%+0.08
Crypto, hourly73850.1%45.0%26314.4%19.7%−0.56
Crypto, 4-hour4250.0%42.5%185.6%19.2%−0.83
All markets, weekly5070.8%56.0%742.9%22.2%+0.29

Read the table in pairs of columns. On daily charts, 53.3% of matching lows were followed by a gain 10 days later, against 54.2% for random days on the same assets. The excess return over the rest of the market is +0.04%, with a 95% confidence interval from −0.38% to +0.42%: no clear edge. The 2:1 setup reached its target in 36.9% of 515 trades against 32.6% for the same setup on random dates, an expectancy of +0.12 R before costs.

The table can help you choose where to look, but no row shows an edge that survives both our correction and costs. On the 10-bar move, hourly crypto stands out: on 738 hourly crypto patterns, 50.1% were higher 10 bars later against 45.0% for random bars, an excess return over the rest of the market of +0.18%. That gap does not pass our statistical test and turns negative after costs (−0.02%): hence its No clear edge label, and the move is small. Daily indices show a larger 10-bar excess return (+1.82%), on only 23 patterns, too few to interpret. The bench finds no matching low at all on hourly forex or daily crypto, and only 42 on 4-hour crypto charts. The 2:1 trade showed no significant gap on any row with enough trades: on hourly crypto charts it averaged −0.56 R against −0.40 R on random dates. On weekly charts, 70.8% of 50 patterns were higher 10 weeks later against 56.0% for random weeks, but the average excess return, +0.8%, has an error margin far too wide to read: no clear edge. Whatever the row, the intraday trade still lost money before fees. The full method is in our methodology.

Matching low pattern examples

The Real examples section shows real matching lows picked by our bench, with their actual outcome. The cases written up below come from daily charts of two stock indices and a US high yield bond ETF (prices adjusted for dividends); the S&P/TSX case is also a card in that section. They help to see that the same candlestick pattern leads to very different trades. None of the three cases below was stopped out, a matter of the draw: the table above shows that most trades did not reach their target.

Example 1: target reached (Nikkei 225)

On June 17 and 20, 2011, the Nikkei 225 closed at 9,351.40 and 9,354.32 after a fall, with a low at 9,318.62. The buy stop above the high (9,447.44) triggered on June 21, and on June 29 the index opened at 9,767.91, above the 2:1 target at 9,705.08, so the target order filled at that open: a gain of 2.5 R. The Nikkei was 6.5% higher 10 days after the pattern.

Example 2: a slower path to the target (HYG)

On November 30 and December 1, 2021, the HYG bond ETF closed at 64.78 and 64.79, with a low at 64.69. The buy stop at 65.22 triggered on December 2, and the market reached the 2:1 target at 66.28 on December 23, 15 sessions after entry, with the stop at 64.69 never touched. HYG was 1.7% higher 10 days after the pattern.

Example 3: canceled before trading (S&P/TSX)

On January 25 and 26, 1984, the Toronto S&P/TSX composite index closed at 2,501.53 and 2,501.63. The next session the market broke the low at 2,495.05 before the high at 2,529.76: the setup was canceled. The index was 4.9% lower 10 days after the pattern: the cancellation kept the trader out of a further decline.

Where the pattern fits in technical analysis

Technical analysis groups each candlestick pattern by what it suggests: reversal patterns signal a potential trend reversal, continuation patterns a pause. The matching low belongs to the bullish reversal group, with the hammer, the bullish engulfing, the piercing line and the morning star. It is one of the weakest-looking signals in this group, because neither candlestick shows strength. In trading, treat it as a setup to watch, not as a buy signal: on its own, it showed no proven edge over chance in our tests.

Frequently asked questions

Is this pattern a reliable reversal signal?

Not on its own. On 1,844 daily occurrences, it was followed by a rise as often as a random day on the same assets.

How does this pattern differ from the three stars in the south?

The three stars in the south has three shrinking bearish candles with higher lows; the matching low has two. The first is so rare that our bench, with its strict definition, finds no daily case of it, while the matching low is far more frequent: one every 4,271 daily bars.

What is the best timeframe for this pattern?

For the 2:1 trade, no timeframe stands out: every row with enough trades reads no clear edge, and the hourly crypto row loses money on average before fees. Weekly charts show the highest raw rate (42.9% of 2:1 targets hit), but on only 7 trades, far too few to read. On the 10-bar direction, no row with enough patterns passes even a simple test; hourly crypto comes closest, with a small move (see the statistics section).

Which trading strategies use it?

It has two uses: buying the break above the high after a matching low on support, and using it in a pullback inside an uptrend. In both, the open of the next sessions decides: no move above the high, no trade. Our statistics test the break above the high on every matching low, with no support filter; for the pullback use, setups above the 200-day average did slightly better than those below it, a small gap not corrected for multiple tests.

Is there a bearish version?

Yes, the matching high: two bullish candles closing at the same price in an uptrend. We have not published statistics for it.

Summary

  • The matching low is two bearish candles with equal closes after a downtrend, read as a support and a potential bullish reversal.
  • On 1,844 daily occurrences, 53.3% were higher 10 days later, against 54.2% for random days.
  • The 2:1 setup reached its target in 36.9% of 515 trades, against 32.6% on random dates, for +0.12 R before costs.
  • 71.7% of daily setups were canceled before the buy stop triggered: the two candles alone are not a position.

This page is educational, not investment advice: results measured on past prices do not guarantee future results.

About the author and the data. Written by Amaury, founder of PatternsWizard, who is passionate about finance, quantitative trading and data analysis. He built the PatternsWizard test bench, which applies the same published rules to full market history: crypto, forex, US stocks, ETFs, indices and commodities. Trades and win rates are compared with random bars on the same assets, excess returns with the rest of the market, with error margins and a correction for multiple testing, and the whole pipeline is checked on random-walk prices, where nothing can be predicted. Statistics on this page were generated on November 5, 2026. The full methodology explains every step.

, Founder of PatternsWizard

Passionate about finance, quantitative trading and data analysis. Amaury built the PatternsWizard test bench, which detects each pattern on full price history and measures what happened next against random entries.

Statistics on this page come from our open methodology: every occurrence our rule finds on full history, compared with chance. How we test patterns.

179 patterns testedRandom-walk self-test passed